Skip to content

FELV vs SCHV

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF

FELVBNYSE Arca

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF

SCHVANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SCHV −0.14pt a year

FELV0.18%SCHV0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

SCHV 12.0×the volume

FELV265KSCHV3.17M

FELV vs SCHV Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+29.3%FELV+22.1%SCHV

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FELV +29.3%. SCHV +22.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FELV 0.18%
SCHV 0.04%, better
Fund size
FELV $3.41B
SCHV $15.7B
1Y total return
FELV +29.3%, better
SCHV +22.1%
Yield (12M)
FELV 1.38%
SCHV 1.81%, better
Holdings
FELV 404
SCHV 568
Avg volume (30D)
FELV 265K sh
SCHV 3.17M sh, better
NAV per share
FELV $42.95
SCHV $34.62
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FELV: Cost 59, Risk 81, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings 40, Durability 60. SCHV: Cost 96, Risk 68, Mission 88, Tradability 95, Holdings 59, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for FELV, SCHV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFELVSCHV
Cost30% weightB59A96Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA88
Risk15% weightA81HigherB68
Tradability15% weightB58A95Higher
Holdings10% weightC40B59Higher
Durability5% weightB60B68Higher

Rank among US Value Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FELV and SCHV are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Value Index⁠

Category · 40 funds
See all 40 ›

SCHV ranks 1st and FELV 16th of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASCHVSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AVTVVanguard Morningstar Value ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 14BIWNiShares Russell 2000 Value ETFScore 63
  4. Rank 16BFELVFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF Score 60
  5. Rank 17BFVALFidelity Value Factor ETFScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FELVBFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF

SCHVASchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF

In short

FELV Index-fund shape, active brain. Fidelity's quant models tilt roughly 300 large-cap value stocks while the Russell 1000 Value stays the yardstick, and the whole thing costs 0.18%, the median fee in its peer group.

SCHV No data

Stated mandate

FELV The fund is a diversified domestic equity strategy focused on large-cap value stocks. It uses quantitative, multifactor statistical models to seek benchmark outperformance.

SCHV No data

Why people hold it

  • FELV Quantitative multifactor models choose the holdings, but the Russell 1000 Value Index remains the benchmark, so the portfolio still looks and behaves like US large-cap value.
  • At 0.18%, it costs exactly the median of its value-factor peer group, unusual for a strategy that actively tries to beat its index rather than match it.
  • Same 0.18% as IWD, the plain tracker on the same Russell 1000 Value benchmark, so the active tilt is not priced at a premium to that route.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund spread across about 300 large-cap names, paying quarterly, run under a strategy whose track record starts at its 2007 launch.

SCHV No data

Worth knowing

  • FELV Plain-vanilla value beta is cheaper: VTV charges 0.03% and SCHV 0.04%. The quant tilt costs several times that.
  • Aiming to beat the Russell 1000 Value means results can diverge from it in either direction, which a straight index tracker will not do.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume leader in its category, so spreads on larger orders can run wider than at the busiest value ETFs.

SCHV No data

Full FELV profile⁠

Full SCHV profile⁠

FELV vs SCHV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FELV vs SCHV Cost

Overpaying FELV vs SCHV

$2,900

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FELV 0.18%

    $3,749

  • SCHV 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FELV 0.18%
  • SCHV 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K$4K051015202530FELV $3,749SCHV $849

Year by year

YearFELVSCHVOverpaying
10$328$73$255
20$1,281$288$993
30$3,749$849$2,900

Expense ratio

  • 0.18%FELV
  • 0.04%SCHV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Value Index funds
  • Median 0.20%

SCHV 3rd cheapest of 40 funds

FELV 16th cheapest of 40 funds

FELV vs SCHV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FELV 1.38%
SCHV 1.81%, better
Payout (12M)
FELV $0.59
SCHV $0.63
Last payment
FELV $0.15
SCHV $0.16
Ex-dividend
FELV Sep 18, 2026
SCHV Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
FELV Sep 22, 2026
SCHV Sep 28, 2026
Frequency
FELV Quarterly
SCHV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FELVQuarterly · 13 paymentsAll FELV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 13 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Nov 14, 2023 $0.09; Dec 28, 2023 $0.01; Mar 15, 2024 $0.26; Jun 21, 2024 $0.07; Sep 20, 2024 $0.14; Dec 20, 2024 $0.15; Mar 21, 2025 $0.14; Jun 20, 2025 $0.15; Sep 19, 2025 $0.15; Dec 19, 2025 $0.14; Mar 20, 2026 $0.16; Jun 18, 2026 $0.14; Sep 18, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
SCHVQuarterly · 40 paymentsAll SCHV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 40 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2017 $0.10; Jun 19, 2017 $0.10; Sep 18, 2017 $0.11; Dec 18, 2017 $0.12; Mar 16, 2018 $0.11; Jun 26, 2018 $0.12; Sep 25, 2018 $0.13; Dec 12, 2018 $0.14; Mar 20, 2019 $0.13; Jun 26, 2019 $0.13; Sep 25, 2019 $0.14; Dec 12, 2019 $0.21; Mar 25, 2020 $0.14; Jun 24, 2020 $0.12; Sep 23, 2020 $0.22; Dec 10, 2020 $0.13; Mar 24, 2021 $0.10; Jun 23, 2021 $0.12; Sep 22, 2021 $0.12; Dec 8, 2021 $0.14; Dec 30, 2021 $0.0023; Mar 23, 2022 $0.11; Jun 22, 2022 $0.13; Sep 21, 2022 $0.13; Dec 7, 2022 $0.15; Mar 22, 2023 $0.13; Jun 21, 2023 $0.13; Sep 20, 2023 $0.14; Dec 6, 2023 $0.16; Mar 20, 2024 $0.13; Jun 26, 2024 $0.15; Sep 25, 2024 $0.14; Dec 11, 2024 $0.17; Mar 26, 2025 $0.14; Jun 25, 2025 $0.15; Sep 24, 2025 $0.15; Dec 10, 2025 $0.17; Mar 25, 2026 $0.14; Jun 24, 2026 $0.16; Sep 23, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

FELV vs SCHV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FELV 11.7%since Dec 2023SCHV 11.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FELV 1.38since Dec 2023SCHV 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FELV −16.1%since Nov 2023SCHV −19.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FELV 0.80SCHV 0.76

FELV and SCHV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FELVBvsVTVA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF · Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHVAvsVTVA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF · Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FELVBvsIUSVA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF · iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHVAvsIUSVA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF · iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FELVBvsIWDA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF · iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHVAvsIWDA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF · iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.