Skip to content

FEMD vs SEIV

First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF

FEMDDNYSE Arca

SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

SEIVACboe

Overlap

6.4%by weight

Expense ratio

SEIV −0.40pt a year

FEMD0.55%SEIV0.15%

Avg volume · 30D

SEIV 100.3×the volume

FEMD1.41KSEIV141K

FEMD vs SEIV Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−0.7%FEMD+1.1%SEIV

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. FEMD −0.7%. SEIV +1.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%2.5%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FEMD 0.55%
SEIV 0.15%, better
Fund size
FEMD $4M
SEIV $1.62B
1Y total return
FEMD No data
SEIV +27.1%
Yield (12M)
FEMD No data
SEIV 1.57%
Holdings
FEMD 60
SEIV 123
Avg volume (30D)
FEMD 1.41K sh
SEIV 141K sh, better
NAV per share
FEMD $35.73
SEIV $49.52
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FEMD: Cost 42, Risk 6, Mission not scored, Tradability 31, Holdings 76, Durability 32. SEIV: Cost 98, Risk 66, Mission 82, Tradability 91, Holdings 76, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for FEMD, SEIV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFEMDSEIV
Cost30% weightC42A98Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA82
Risk15% weightF6B66Higher
Tradability15% weightD31A91Higher
Holdings10% weightA76A76
Durability5% weightD32A75Higher

Rank among US Active Value funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FEMD and SEIV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Value⁠

Category · 64 funds
See all 64 ›

SEIV ranks 2nd and FEMD 50th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2ASEIVSEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETFScore 85
  3. Rank 2AWTVWisdomTree U.S. Value FundScore 85
  4. Rank 48DKATScharf ETFScore 37
  5. Rank 50DFEMDFirst Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETFScore 36
  6. Rank 51DBASVBrown Advisory Sustainable Value ETFScore 33

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FEMDDFirst Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF

SEIVASEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

In short

FEMD First Eagle takes its value discipline down the market cap ladder: an active mid-cap fund hunting companies whose problems look temporary or fixable, with a visible catalyst attached. Stock picking, not a cheapness screen. It launched in 2026.

SEIV Active quant value stock-picking at an index-fund price. SEIV screens U.S. large caps for cheap valuations plus quality, momentum and low volatility, then runs a concentrated book of roughly 80 names for 0.15% a year.

Stated mandate

FEMD The fund seeks long-term growth of capital and uses a bottom-up fundamental process for U.S. mid-cap companies, focusing on transitory or fixable issues and identifiable catalysts.

SEIV The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through primarily U.S. common stocks priced below fundamental valuation measures, using a quantitative, active stock-selection approach.

Why people hold it

  • FEMD The process is judgment, not a filter: bottom-up work on U.S. mid caps with transitory or fixable issues and an identifiable catalyst, marketed as Catalyst-Driven Value.firsteagle.com
  • 0.55% buys active management and sits right at the median for its active value peer group, so the First Eagle name carries no premium.
  • Mid cap is the whole mandate, not a tilt. It measures itself against the Russell Mid Cap Value and Russell Mid Cap indexes rather than a large-cap yardstick.firsteagle.com
  • SEIV 0.15% a year for genuine active selection, against a 0.55% median in its U.S. value peer group. It matches the cheapest large-value quant funds rather than charging active prices.
  • Value is not the only screen. The model also weighs quality, momentum and low volatility, which is how a cheap-stock strategy tries to avoid the cheap-for-a-reason trap.
  • Other funds measured against the S&P 500 in this cohort charge far more (LSVD 0.40%, GSPY 0.50%, VNSE 1.34%). SEIV runs its version at 0.15%.
  • Sits among the strongest implementations in a crowded U.S. value field, and trades with enough regular activity to be workable for ordinary retail order sizes.

Worth knowing

  • FEMD Systematic routes to the same asset class cost less: Avantis' AVMV charges 0.20% for rules-based U.S. mid-cap value.
  • A 2026 launch with a small asset base. There is no long record to judge, and young, thinly traded funds can show wider spreads, so limit orders earn their keep.
  • The stated goal is long-term growth of capital. Income is not part of the design.
  • SEIV About 80 stocks measured against a 500-name benchmark. That concentration means stretches where it looks nothing like the S&P 500, in either direction.
  • Launched in 2022, so the live record is short, and the asset base is mid-sized rather than among the giants of the value aisle.
  • You get the factor recipe, not the trade-by-trade logic: selection sits inside a quantitative model. Distributions land quarterly, not monthly.

Full FEMD profile⁠

Full SEIV profile⁠

FEMD vs SEIV Holdings

How FEMD and SEIV differ

Overlap by weight

6.4%

Shared holdings make up 12.5% of FEMD and 7.2% of SEIV.

Level by level

  • Holdings6 in both6.4%
  • Countryby domicile95.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for FEMD.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FEMD and SEIV, widest gap first
CountryMore in FEMDMore in SEIV
CanadaFEMD +3.8 points
United StatesSEIV +3.1 points
MexicoSEIV +1.1 points
ChinaFEMD +0.9 points
BrazilSEIV +0.4 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FEMD25.1%
  • SEIV25.0%

Securities held

  • FEMD59
  • SEIV122

Asset class

FEMD
Equity
SEIV
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FEMD53
  • In both6
  • Only in SEIV116

Only in FEMD

53 securities, 87.5% of FEMD by weight

  • Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc Common Stock USD2.73%
  • Antero Resources Corp Common Stock USD 0.012.53%
  • Glacier Bancorp Inc Common Stock USD 0.012.53%

Only in SEIV

116 securities, 92.8% of SEIV by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp3.54%
  • Apple Inc3.48%
  • General Motors Co2.61%

Weight gaps

All 6 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FEMD and SEIV, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FEMDMore in SEIV
Teradata Corp Common Stock USD 0.01TDCFEMD +2.03 points
Tenet Healthcare Corp Common Stock USD 0.05THCFEMD +1.66 points
Regions Financial Corp Common Stock USD 0.01RFFEMD +1.17 points
Reinsurance Group of America Inc Common Stock USDRGAFEMD +0.68 points
Delta Air Lines Inc Common Stock USD 0.0001DALFEMD +0.59 points
Cardinal Health Inc Common Stock USD 0CAHSEIV +0.36 points

All 64 FEMD holdings⁠All 122 SEIV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FEMD vs SEIV Cost

Overpaying FEMD vs SEIV

$7,767

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FEMD 0.55%

    $10,904

  • SEIV 0.15%

    $3,137

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FEMD 0.55%
  • SEIV 0.15%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530FEMD $10,904SEIV $3,137

Year by year

YearFEMDSEIVOverpaying
10$988$274$714
20$3,790$1,071$2,719
30$10,904$3,137$7,767

Expense ratio

  • 0.55%FEMD
  • 0.15%SEIV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Value funds
  • Median 0.55%

SEIV 2nd cheapest of 64 funds

FEMD 33rd cheapest of 64 funds

FEMD vs SEIV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
FEMD No data
SEIV 1.57%
Payout (12M)
FEMD None
SEIV $0.78
Last payment
FEMD No data
SEIV $0.21
Ex-dividend
FEMD No data
SEIV Oct 5, 2026
Paid on
FEMD No data
SEIV Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
FEMD No data
SEIV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

FEMDAll FEMD payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SEIVQuarterly · 18 paymentsAll SEIV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Jul 5, 2022 $0.07; Oct 4, 2022 $0.14; Dec 27, 2022 $0.17; Apr 3, 2023 $0.16; Jul 3, 2023 $0.14; Oct 3, 2023 $0.13; Dec 26, 2023 $0.15; Apr 3, 2024 $0.10; Jul 8, 2024 $0.17; Oct 4, 2024 $0.15; Dec 27, 2024 $0.14; Apr 3, 2025 $0.16; Jul 7, 2025 $0.15; Oct 3, 2025 $0.13; Dec 29, 2025 $0.18; Apr 6, 2026 $0.19; Jul 6, 2026 $0.20; Oct 5, 2026 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD

FEMD vs SEIV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FEMD No dataSEIV 12.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FEMD No dataSEIV 1.80
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FEMD No dataSEIV −18.2%since May 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FEMD 0.75SEIV 0.89

FEMD and SEIV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FEMDDvsAVLVA

    First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEIVAvsAVLVA

    SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMDDvsWTVA

    First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEIVAvsWTVA

    SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMDDvsDFLVA

    First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEIVAvsDFLVA

    SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.