FESM ranks 2nd and JSML 5th of 39 funds in the US Active Small-Cap Category.
FESM vs JSML
FESM −0.02pt a year
0.28%0.30%
FESM 39.2×the volume
1.02M26K
FESM vs JSML Performance
+23.4%+18.2%
- FESM 0.28%, better
- JSML 0.30%
- FESM $6.41B
- JSML $378M
- FESM +23.4%, better
- JSML +18.2%
- FESM 0.86%, better
- JSML 0.30%
- FESM 892
- JSML 123
- FESM 1.02M sh, better
- JSML 26K sh
- FESM $45.47
- JSML $89.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FESM | JSML |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | A91 |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | C54Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | A78 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | C48 |
| Durability | A93Higher | A82 |
Rank among US Active Small-Cap funds
Same Category. FESM and JSML are both graded against the same 39 US Active Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FESMA
JSMLA
In short
FESM A quant small-cap strategy that has been running since 2007 and moved into an ETF wrapper in 2023 with the same mandate. It nudges the Russell 2000 rather than copying it, and charges far less than the typical active small-cap fund.
JSML Janus Henderson's rules-driven answer to small-cap growth: a systematic screen benchmarked against the Russell 2000 Growth Index, priced at 0.30% a year while the typical active small-cap peer charges more.
Stated mandate
FESM The fund is a diversified U.S. equity strategy focused on small-cap companies. It seeks to outperform its benchmark through a quantitative process that balances risk and return.
JSML The fund seeks long-term capital growth. Normally, it invests at least 80% of net assets in equity securities of small-cap companies chosen for growth potential.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FESM vs JSML Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FESM vs JSML Cost
Overpaying JSML vs FESM
$394
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FESM 0.28%
$5,755
JSML 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FESM | JSML | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $545 | $36 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $2,113 | $137 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $6,149 | $394 |
- 0.28%FESM, cheaper
- 0.30%JSML
- Middle half of US Active Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.55%
FESM 2nd cheapest of 39 funds
JSML 4th cheapest of 39 funds
FESM vs JSML Dividends
- FESM 0.86%, better
- JSML 0.30%
- FESM $0.39
- JSML $0.27
- FESM $0.10
- JSML $0.05
- FESM Sep 18, 2026
- JSML Sep 30, 2026
- FESM Sep 22, 2026
- JSML Oct 6, 2026
- FESM Quarterly
- JSML Quarterly
Distribution history
FESM vs JSML Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FESM 19.6%JSML 21.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FESM 0.97JSML 0.87
- Worst fall
- FESM −26.9%JSML −37.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FESM 1.34JSML 1.28
FESM and JSML in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
