FESM ranks 2nd and MMSC 34th of 39 funds in the US Active Small-Cap Category.
FESM vs MMSC
FESM −0.67pt a year
0.28%0.95%
FESM 221.3×the volume
1.02M4.6K
FESM vs MMSC Performance
+23.4%+8.6%
- FESM 0.28%, better
- MMSC 0.95%
- FESM $6.41B
- MMSC $52M
- FESM +23.4%, better
- MMSC +8.6%
- FESM 0.86%, better
- MMSC 0.00%
- FESM 892
- MMSC 199
- FESM 1.02M sh, better
- MMSC 4.6K sh
- FESM $45.47
- MMSC $26.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FESM | MMSC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | F3 |
| Mission | A85Higher | A73 |
| Risk | C54Higher | F19 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | B55 |
| Durability | A93Higher | A70 |
Rank among US Active Small-Cap funds
Same Category. FESM and MMSC are both graded against the same 39 US Active Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FESMA
MMSCF
In short
FESM A quant small-cap strategy that has been running since 2007 and moved into an ETF wrapper in 2023 with the same mandate. It nudges the Russell 2000 rather than copying it, and charges far less than the typical active small-cap fund.
MMSC Two small-cap shops, one ticker. Driehaus and Stephens each feed stock ideas to First Trust, which decides how much money each sleeve runs. Active small-cap stock picking priced like the boutique product it is.
Stated mandate
FESM The fund is a diversified U.S. equity strategy focused on small-cap companies. It seeks to outperform its benchmark through a quantitative process that balances risk and return.
MMSC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities issued by small capitalization companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FESM vs MMSC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FESM vs MMSC Cost
Overpaying MMSC vs FESM
$12,114
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FESM 0.28%
$5,755
MMSC 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FESM | MMSC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $1,678 | $1,169 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $6,322 | $4,346 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $17,869 | $12,114 |
- 0.28%FESM, cheaper
- 0.95%MMSC
- Middle half of US Active Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.55%
FESM 2nd cheapest of 39 funds
MMSC 38th cheapest of 39 funds
FESM vs MMSC Dividends
- FESM 0.86%, better
- MMSC 0.00%
- FESM $0.39
- MMSC None
- FESM $0.10
- MMSC
- FESM Sep 18, 2026
- MMSC
- FESM Sep 22, 2026
- MMSC
- FESM Quarterly
- MMSC
Distribution history
FESM vs MMSC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FESM 19.6%MMSC 19.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- FESM 0.97MMSC 0.93
- Worst fall
- FESM −26.9%MMSC −40.8%
- Market sensitivity
- FESM 1.34MMSC 1.34Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
FESM and MMSC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
