FESM ranks 2nd and OSCV 20th of 39 funds in the US Active Small-Cap Category.
FESM vs OSCV
FESM −0.51pt a year
0.28%0.79%
FESM 13.7×the volume
1.02M74.1K
FESM vs OSCV Performance
+23.4%+12.4%
- FESM 0.28%, better
- OSCV 0.79%
- FESM $6.41B
- OSCV $628M
- FESM +23.4%, better
- OSCV +12.4%
- FESM 0.86%
- OSCV 1.12%, better
- FESM 892
- OSCV 70
- FESM 1.02M sh, better
- OSCV 74.1K sh
- FESM $45.47
- OSCV $41.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FESM | OSCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | F14 |
| Mission | A85Higher | C40 |
| Risk | C54 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | A93 | A93 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | D36 |
| Durability | A93Higher | A76 |
Rank among US Active Small-Cap funds
Same Category. FESM and OSCV are both graded against the same 39 US Active Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FESMA
OSCVC
In short
FESM A quant small-cap strategy that has been running since 2007 and moved into an ETF wrapper in 2023 with the same mandate. It nudges the Russell 2000 rather than copying it, and charges far less than the typical active small-cap fund.
OSCV Small-cap value with a filter. OSCV screens for yield plus growth and momentum rather than scooping up whatever is cheapest, and it has run that way since 2018 inside a peer group dominated by giant large-cap index trackers.
Stated mandate
FESM The fund is a diversified U.S. equity strategy focused on small-cap companies. It seeks to outperform its benchmark through a quantitative process that balances risk and return.
OSCV The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FESM vs OSCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FESM vs OSCV Cost
Overpaying OSCV vs FESM
$9,419
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FESM 0.28%
$5,755
OSCV 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FESM | OSCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $1,405 | $896 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $5,331 | $3,355 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $15,174 | $9,419 |
- 0.28%FESM, cheaper
- 0.79%OSCV
- Middle half of US Active Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.55%
FESM 2nd cheapest of 39 funds
OSCV 32nd cheapest of 39 funds
FESM vs OSCV Dividends
- FESM 0.86%
- OSCV 1.12%, better
- FESM $0.39
- OSCV $0.46
- FESM $0.10
- OSCV $0.13
- FESM Sep 18, 2026
- OSCV Sep 29, 2026
- FESM Sep 22, 2026
- OSCV Sep 30, 2026
- FESM Quarterly
- OSCV Quarterly
Distribution history
FESM vs OSCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FESM 19.6%OSCV 14.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- FESM 0.97OSCV 0.61
- Worst fall
- FESM −26.9%OSCV −22.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FESM 1.34OSCV 0.72
FESM and OSCV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
