FESM ranks 2nd and SAWS 24th of 39 funds in the US Active Small-Cap Category.
FESM vs SAWS
FESM −0.27pt a year
0.28%0.55%
FESM 146.6×the volume
1.06M7.2K
FESM vs SAWS Performance
+25.8%+7.3%
- FESM 0.28%, better
- SAWS 0.55%
- FESM $6.74B
- SAWS $7M
- FESM +25.8%, better
- SAWS +7.3%
- FESM 0.86%, better
- SAWS 0.02%
- FESM 895
- SAWS 71
- FESM 1.06M sh, better
- SAWS 7.2K sh
- FESM $45.75
- SAWS $21.36
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FESM | SAWS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | C54 |
| Mission | A85Higher | A79 |
| Risk | B66Higher | F14 |
| Tradability | A91Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | D38 |
| Durability | A93Higher | F24 |
Rank among US Active Small-Cap funds
Same Category. FESM and SAWS are both graded against the same 39 US Active Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FESMA
SAWSC
In short
FESM A quant small-cap strategy that has been running since 2007 and moved into an ETF wrapper in 2023 with the same mandate. It nudges the Russell 2000 rather than copying it, and charges far less than the typical active small-cap fund.
SAWS Most small-cap funds are built to chase the upside. SAWS writes the other half into its mandate: the prospectus objective names downside protection and low standard deviation alongside growth, pursued through an active, multi-screen model.
Stated mandate
FESM The fund is a diversified U.S. equity strategy focused on small-cap companies. It seeks to outperform its benchmark through a quantitative process that balances risk and return.
SAWS The Fund seeks risk-adjusted returns, upside participation, downside protection, low standard deviation, and long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FESM vs SAWS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FESM vs SAWS Cost
Overpaying SAWS vs FESM
$5,149
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FESM 0.28%
$5,755
SAWS 0.55%
$10,904
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FESM | SAWS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $988 | $479 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $3,790 | $1,814 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $10,904 | $5,149 |
- 0.28%FESM, cheaper
- 0.55%SAWS
- Middle half of US Active Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.55%
FESM 2nd cheapest of 39 funds
SAWS 18th cheapest of 39 funds
FESM vs SAWS Dividends
- FESM 0.86%, better
- SAWS 0.02%
- FESM $0.39
- SAWS $0.0045
- FESM $0.10
- SAWS $0.0045
- FESM Sep 18, 2026
- SAWS Dec 31, 2025
- FESM Sep 22, 2026
- SAWS Jan 5, 2026
- FESM Quarterly
- SAWS Irregular
Distribution history
FESM vs SAWS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FESM 19.6%SAWS 18.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FESM 0.97SAWS 0.26
- Worst fall
- FESM −26.9%SAWS −22.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FESM 1.33SAWS 0.86
FESM and SAWS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
