FESM ranks 2nd and SCDS 15th of 39 funds in the US Active Small-Cap Category.
FESM vs SCDS
FESM −0.12pt a year
0.28%0.40%
FESM 971.1×the volume
1.06M1.09K
FESM vs SCDS Performance
+25.8%+25.5%
- FESM 0.28%, better
- SCDS 0.40%
- FESM $6.74B
- SCDS $9M
- FESM +25.8%, better
- SCDS +25.5%
- FESM 0.86%
- SCDS 1.10%, better
- FESM 895
- SCDS 278
- FESM 1.06M sh, better
- SCDS 1.09K sh
- FESM $45.75
- SCDS $70.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FESM | SCDS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | A76 |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | B66 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | A91Higher | F14 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | B61 |
| Durability | A93Higher | B55 |
Rank among US Active Small-Cap funds
Same Category. FESM and SCDS are both graded against the same 39 US Active Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FESMA
SCDSB
In short
FESM A quant small-cap strategy that has been running since 2007 and moved into an ETF wrapper in 2023 with the same mandate. It nudges the Russell 2000 rather than copying it, and charges far less than the typical active small-cap fund.
SCDS JPMorgan pairs human fundamental analysts with a data science engine to pick small caps, then spreads the calls across roughly 300 names. Active stock picking priced closer to a screened index fund.
Stated mandate
FESM The fund is a diversified U.S. equity strategy focused on small-cap companies. It seeks to outperform its benchmark through a quantitative process that balances risk and return.
SCDS The fund invests primarily in equity securities of small-cap companies and uses a fundamental data science-enabled investment approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FESM vs SCDS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FESM vs SCDS Cost
Overpaying SCDS vs FESM
$2,335
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FESM 0.28%
$5,755
SCDS 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FESM | SCDS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $723 | $214 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $2,793 | $817 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $8,090 | $2,335 |
- 0.28%FESM, cheaper
- 0.40%SCDS
- Middle half of US Active Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.55%
FESM 2nd cheapest of 39 funds
SCDS 10th cheapest of 39 funds
FESM vs SCDS Dividends
- FESM 0.86%
- SCDS 1.10%, better
- FESM $0.39
- SCDS $0.80
- FESM $0.10
- SCDS $0.30
- FESM Sep 18, 2026
- SCDS Sep 22, 2026
- FESM Sep 22, 2026
- SCDS Sep 24, 2026
- FESM Quarterly
- SCDS Quarterly
Distribution history
FESM vs SCDS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FESM 19.6%SCDS 17.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FESM 0.97SCDS 0.63
- Worst fall
- FESM −26.9%SCDS −26.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FESM 1.33SCDS 1.21
FESM and SCDS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
