FESM ranks 2nd and SGRW 30th of 39 funds in the US Active Small-Cap Category.
FESM vs SGRW
FESM −0.52pt a year
0.28%0.80%
FESM 86.4×the volume
1.02M11.8K
FESM vs SGRW Performance
−2.3%−1.1%
- FESM 0.28%, better
- SGRW 0.80%
- FESM $6.41B
- SGRW $27M
- FESM +23.4%
- SGRW
- FESM 0.86%
- SGRW
- FESM 892
- SGRW 129
- FESM 1.02M sh, better
- SGRW 11.8K sh
- FESM $45.47
- SGRW $24.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FESM | SGRW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | F14 |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | C54Higher | F22 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | C45 |
| Durability | A93Higher | C46 |
Rank among US Active Small-Cap funds
Same Category. FESM and SGRW are both graded against the same 39 US Active Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FESMA
SGRWD
In short
FESM A quant small-cap strategy that has been running since 2007 and moved into an ETF wrapper in 2023 with the same mandate. It nudges the Russell 2000 rather than copying it, and charges far less than the typical active small-cap fund.
SGRW Harbor rents talent instead of building it: SGRW hands a US small-cap growth portfolio to Granahan, a boutique that has done nothing but small-cap growth for three decades. Real stock picking in an ETF wrapper, priced like a stock picker.
Stated mandate
FESM The fund is a diversified U.S. equity strategy focused on small-cap companies. It seeks to outperform its benchmark through a quantitative process that balances risk and return.
SGRW The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FESM vs SGRW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FESM vs SGRW Cost
Overpaying SGRW vs FESM
$9,591
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FESM 0.28%
$5,755
SGRW 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FESM | SGRW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $1,422 | $913 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $5,393 | $3,417 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $15,346 | $9,591 |
- 0.28%FESM, cheaper
- 0.80%SGRW
- Middle half of US Active Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.55%
FESM 2nd cheapest of 39 funds
SGRW 34th cheapest of 39 funds
FESM vs SGRW Dividends
- FESM 0.86%
- SGRW
- FESM $0.39
- SGRW None
- FESM $0.10
- SGRW
- FESM Sep 18, 2026
- SGRW
- FESM Sep 22, 2026
- SGRW
- FESM Quarterly
- SGRW
Distribution history
FESM vs SGRW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FESM 19.6%SGRW
- Return per unit of risk
- FESM 0.97SGRW
- Worst fall
- FESM −26.9%SGRW
- Market sensitivity
- FESM 1.34SGRW 1.49
FESM and SGRW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
