FESM ranks 2nd and SQLV 10th of 39 funds in the US Active Small-Cap Category.
FESM vs SQLV
FESM −0.32pt a year
0.28%0.60%
FESM 167.0×the volume
1.02M6.1K
FESM vs SQLV Performance
+23.4%+28.9%
- FESM 0.28%, better
- SQLV 0.60%
- FESM $6.41B
- SQLV $40M
- FESM +23.4%
- SQLV +28.9%, better
- FESM 0.86%
- SQLV 1.01%, better
- FESM 892
- SQLV 301
- FESM 1.02M sh, better
- SQLV 6.1K sh
- FESM $45.47
- SQLV $53.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FESM | SQLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | C48 |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | C54 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | A93Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | A71 |
| Durability | A93Higher | A71 |
Rank among US Active Small-Cap funds
Same Category. FESM and SQLV are both graded against the same 39 US Active Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FESMA
SQLVB
In short
FESM A quant small-cap strategy that has been running since 2007 and moved into an ETF wrapper in 2023 with the same mandate. It nudges the Russell 2000 rather than copying it, and charges far less than the typical active small-cap fund.
SQLV An active small-cap fund with an algorithm at the wheel. Royce's quant screen ranks US small caps on value, quality and momentum, then spreads the money across roughly 300 names instead of a concentrated stock-picker's short list.
Stated mandate
FESM The fund is a diversified U.S. equity strategy focused on small-cap companies. It seeks to outperform its benchmark through a quantitative process that balances risk and return.
SQLV The fund seeks long-term capital growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FESM vs SQLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FESM vs SQLV Cost
Overpaying SQLV vs FESM
$6,062
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FESM 0.28%
$5,755
SQLV 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FESM | SQLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $1,076 | $567 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $4,116 | $2,140 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $11,817 | $6,062 |
- 0.28%FESM, cheaper
- 0.60%SQLV
- Middle half of US Active Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.55%
FESM 2nd cheapest of 39 funds
SQLV 22nd cheapest of 39 funds
FESM vs SQLV Dividends
- FESM 0.86%
- SQLV 1.01%, better
- FESM $0.39
- SQLV $0.54
- FESM $0.10
- SQLV $0.15
- FESM Sep 18, 2026
- SQLV Sep 14, 2026
- FESM Sep 22, 2026
- SQLV Sep 17, 2026
- FESM Quarterly
- SQLV Quarterly
Distribution history
FESM vs SQLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FESM 19.6%SQLV 18.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FESM 0.97SQLV 0.73
- Worst fall
- FESM −26.9%SQLV −26.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- FESM 1.34SQLV 1.00
FESM and SQLV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
