FEZ ranks 4th and FKU 12th of 12 funds in the Europe Region Category.
FEZ vs FKU
FEZ −0.51pt a year
0.29%0.80%
FEZ 569.5×the volume
857K1.51K
FEZ +0.8pt
+10.4%+9.6%
FEZ vs FKU Performance
+57.6%+57.2%
- FEZ 0.29%, better
- FKU 0.80%
- FEZ $4.16B
- FKU $35M
- FEZ +7.5%
- FKU +20.3%, better
- FEZ 2.80%
- FKU 3.73%, better
- FEZ 53
- FKU 78
- FEZ 857K sh, better
- FKU 1.51K sh
- FEZ $65.89
- FKU $54.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FEZ | FKU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | F7 |
| Mission | A100Higher | F18 |
| Risk | C43 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | F13 |
| Holdings | C52 | B65Higher |
| Durability | A77Higher | D28 |
Rank among Europe Region funds
Same Category. FEZ and FKU are both graded against the same 12 Europe Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FEZA
FKUD
In short
FEZ Fifty eurozone blue chips, one ticker, running since 2002. FEZ is the long-standing US-listed route into the euro area's biggest companies, and it charges well below the typical index fund in its peer group.
FKU Most UK funds hand you the London giants in order of size. FKU runs a rules-based screen on growth and value metrics instead, then reweights about 80 British stocks by rank. Same market, very different slice. Live since 2012.
Stated mandate
FEZ The fund seeks to deliver total returns that generally correspond to the EURO STOXX 50 Index before fees and expenses.
FKU The fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX United Kingdom Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FEZ vs FKU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FEZ vs FKU Cost
Overpaying FKU vs FEZ
$9,394
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FEZ 0.29%
$5,952
FKU 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FEZ | FKU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $1,422 | $895 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $5,393 | $3,349 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $15,346 | $9,394 |
- 0.29%FEZ, cheaper
- 0.80%FKU
- Middle half of Europe Region funds
- Median 0.51%
FEZ 4th cheapest of 12 funds
FKU 11th cheapest of 12 funds
FEZ vs FKU Dividends
- FEZ 2.80%
- FKU 3.73%, better
- FEZ $1.83
- FKU $2.07
- FEZ $0.11
- FKU $0.36
- FEZ Sep 21, 2026
- FKU Sep 24, 2026
- FEZ Sep 23, 2026
- FKU Sep 30, 2026
- FEZ Quarterly
- FKU Quarterly
Distribution history
FEZ vs FKU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FEZ
- FKU
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FEZ 14.3%, betterFKU 14.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- FEZ 1.02FKU 1.31, better
- Worst fall
- FEZ −35.1%, betterFKU −41.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FEZ 0.95FKU 1.03
FEZ and FKU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

