ZALT ranks 1st and FFEB 41st of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
FFEB vs ZALT
ZALT −0.16pt a year
0.85%0.69%
ZALT 6.0×the volume
22.9K138K
FFEB +7.1pt
+17.7%+10.6%
FFEB vs ZALT Performance
+12.3%+7.1%
- FFEB 0.85%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- FFEB $1.38B
- ZALT $840M
- FFEB +12.3%, better
- ZALT +7.1%
- FFEB 3
- ZALT 503
- FFEB 22.9K sh
- ZALT 138K sh, better
- FFEB $62.47
- ZALT $34.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FFEB | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | B67 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | A89Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | B63 | A90Higher |
| Durability | A87Higher | B61 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. FFEB and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FFEBC
ZALTA
In short
FFEB The February door into First Trust's buffer lineup: it absorbs the first 10% of a year's decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, and caps the upside in exchange. Same recipe, reset every February since 2020.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
FFEB The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to a 15.01% upside cap and a 10% downside buffer over the current target-outcome period.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FFEB vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FFEB vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying FFEB vs ZALT
$2,770
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FFEB 0.85%
$16,199
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FFEB | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,232 | $276 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $4,697 | $1,009 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $13,429 | $2,770 |
- 0.85%FFEB
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
FFEB 60th cheapest of 77 funds
FFEB vs ZALT Dividends
- FFEB None
- ZALT None
Distribution history
FFEB vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FFEB 7.7%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FFEB 1.60, betterZALT 1.50
- Worst fall
- FFEB −13.8%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FFEB 0.61ZALT 0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.