Skip to content

FFUT vs HOLD

Fidelity Managed Futures ETF

FFUTBNasdaq

Harbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD)

HOLDCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

HOLD −0.10pt a year

FFUT0.80%HOLD0.70%

Avg volume · 30D

FFUT 22.4×the volume

FFUT43.3KHOLD1.93K

FFUT vs HOLD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+20.9%FFUT+1.3%HOLD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FFUT +20.9%. HOLD +1.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%5%10%15%25%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FFUT 0.80%
HOLD 0.70%, better
Fund size
FFUT $394M
HOLD $4M
1Y total return
FFUT +20.9%, better
HOLD +1.3%
Holdings
FFUT 61
HOLD 10
Avg volume (30D)
FFUT 43.3K sh, better
HOLD 1.93K sh
NAV per share
FFUT $62.49
HOLD $31.38
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FFUT: Cost 63, Risk 77, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 0, Durability 73. HOLD: Cost 80, Risk 26, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 30, Durability 35.
Pillar letters and Scores for FFUT, HOLD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFFUTHOLD
Cost30% weightB63A80Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA77HigherD26
Tradability15% weightC46HigherD32
Holdings10% weightF0D30Higher
Durability5% weightA73HigherD35

Rank among Managed Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FFUT and HOLD are both graded against the same 14 Managed Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Managed Futures⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

FFUT ranks 4th and HOLD 10th of 14 funds in the Managed Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1AIMFInvesco Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 2AWTMFWisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy FundScore 75
  3. Rank 3BISMFIshares Managed Futures Active ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BFFUTFidelity Managed Futures ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 4BJPFPJPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 8CKMLMKraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETFScore 45
  7. Rank 10CHOLDHarbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD)Score 40
  8. Rank 11DHFMFUnlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETFScore 28

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FFUTBFidelity Managed Futures ETF

HOLDCHarbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD)

In short

FFUT Fidelity's 2025 entry into managed futures: a systematic long-short model that rides price trends up or down across stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities. The fee sits at 0.80%, net of a waiver through May 31, 2027.

HOLD Own the S&P 500 and rent a trend-follower in one ticker. Harbor's 2025 launch layers an active, quantitative managed futures sleeve on top of passive index replication, so the diversifier rides along instead of taking the equity seat.

Stated mandate

FFUT The fund seeks to capitalize on market trends through a disciplined, systematic long-short strategy. The filing indicates that the portfolio may use broad-based ETFs and futures contracts to pursue return characteristics similar to the Managed Futures sector.

HOLD The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a passive strategy intended to replicate the S&P 500 Index combined with an active, quantitative trend-following managed futures strategy.

Why people hold it

  • FFUT Trend signals run both ways, so the fund can be short bonds or long gold with equal ease across equity, fixed income, currency and commodity markets.sec.gov
  • Commodity exposure runs through a wholly owned Cayman subsidiary, capped at 25% of assets, keeping it all inside a 1940 Act fund that sends a 1099, not a K-1.sec.gov
  • At 0.80% net of a waiver through May 31, 2027, the fee lands near the middle of a small managed futures field rather than at the premium end alternatives often occupy.
  • Returns come from trend signals rather than owning the market, which is why Fidelity pitches it as a diversifier alongside stocks and bonds.fidelity.com
  • HOLD Two jobs, one line item: passive S&P 500 replication plus an active trend-following managed futures strategy, stacked rather than swapped.
  • The 0.70% fee sits below the typical allocation-fund charge, which is unusual for a wrapper carrying an active futures overlay.
  • The trend sleeve casts a global net across markets, and the whole thing sits in a plain 1940 Act ETF: daily pricing, no K-1 partnership paperwork.

Worth knowing

  • FFUT Trades thinly, so bid-ask spreads can widen and larger orders may need patience.
  • Cheaper trend options exist: JPFP charges 0.59% with no waiver, WTMF 0.66% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026.
  • Launched in June 2025, so there is no multi-cycle record, and trend models can give back ground in choppy, directionless markets.
  • HOLD Opened in 2025, so live history is thin. The futures sleeve is discretionary quant, not an index, so outcomes trace the manager's models.
  • Small and lightly traded so far, which tends to mean wider spreads than the household names in the allocation aisle.
  • The stacking shelf is competitive: NTSX and GDE run similar stock-plus-diversifier ideas for under a third of the cost, with years of record behind them.

Full FFUT profile⁠

Full HOLD profile⁠

FFUT vs HOLD Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FFUT vs HOLD Cost

Overpaying FFUT vs HOLD

$1,740

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FFUT 0.80%

    $15,346

  • HOLD 0.70%

    $13,606

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FFUT 0.80%
  • HOLD 0.70%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FFUT $15,346HOLD $13,606

Year by year

YearFFUTHOLDOverpaying
10$1,422$1,250$172
20$5,393$4,760$633
30$15,346$13,606$1,740

Expense ratio

  • 0.80%FFUT
  • 0.70%HOLD, cheaper
  • Middle half of Managed Futures funds
  • Median 0.85%

HOLD 4th cheapest of 14 funds

FFUT 5th cheapest of 14 funds

FFUT vs HOLD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Last payment
FFUT $0.02
HOLD $2.23
Ex-dividend
FFUT Dec 30, 2025
HOLD Dec 19, 2025
Paid on
FFUT Jan 2, 2026
HOLD Dec 24, 2025
Frequency
FFUT Irregular
HOLD Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

FFUTIrregular · 2 paymentsAll FFUT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2025 $1.10; Dec 30, 2025 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502026YTD
HOLDIrregular · 1 paymentAll HOLD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2025 $2.23. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502026YTD

FFUT vs HOLD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FFUT 8.5%since Jul 2025HOLD 15.3%since Sep 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FFUT 1.70since Jul 2025HOLD 0.39since Sep 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FFUT −5.6%since Jun 2025HOLD −9.6%since Aug 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FFUT 0.10HOLD 0.98

FFUT and HOLD in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FFUTBvsIMFA

    Fidelity Managed Futures ETF · Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HOLDCvsIMFA

    Harbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD) · Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FFUTBvsWTMFA

    Fidelity Managed Futures ETF · WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HOLDCvsWTMFA

    Harbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD) · WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FFUTBvsISMFB

    Fidelity Managed Futures ETF · Ishares Managed Futures Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HOLDCvsISMFB

    Harbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD) · Ishares Managed Futures Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.