FHLC ranks 2nd and VHT 3rd of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
FHLC vs VHT
FHLC −0.01pt a year
0.08%0.09%
FHLC 1.04×the volume
246K237K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+12.4%+12.4%
FHLC vs VHT Performance
+42.8%+42.5%
- FHLC 0.08%, better
- VHT 0.09%
- FHLC $3.54B
- VHT $21.8B
- FHLC +28.9%, better
- VHT +28.7%
- FHLC 1.15%
- VHT 1.35%, better
- FHLC 345
- VHT 413
- FHLC 246K sh, better
- VHT 237K sh
- FHLC $88.53
- VHT $342.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FHLC | VHT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | A92 |
| Mission | A81 | A82Higher |
| Risk | A79 | A79 |
| Tradability | A82Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | C54 | B58Higher |
| Durability | A77 | A92Higher |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. FHLC and VHT are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FHLCA
VHTA
In short
FHLC Health care, whole market. FHLC tracks an MSCI index that runs from mega-cap pharma down to small-cap biotech and device makers, roughly 400 names, for 0.08% a year.
VHT The whole US health care sector in one ticket: roughly 400 stocks, an index that reaches well past the megacaps, and a nine-basis-point fee. Trading since 2004, it is one of the category's originals.
Stated mandate
FHLC The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index before fees and expenses.
VHT The fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of health care stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FHLC vs VHT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FHLC vs VHT Cost
Overpaying VHT vs FHLC
$125
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FHLC 0.084%
$1,773
VHT 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FHLC | VHT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $165 | $11 |
| 20 | $603 | $646 | $43 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $1,898 | $125 |
- 0.08%FHLC, cheaper
- 0.09%VHT
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
FHLC 2nd cheapest of 25 funds
VHT 3rd cheapest of 25 funds
FHLC vs VHT Dividends
- FHLC 1.15%
- VHT 1.35%, better
- FHLC $1.02
- VHT $4.61
- FHLC $0.25
- VHT $0.97
- FHLC Sep 18, 2026
- VHT Sep 23, 2026
- FHLC Sep 22, 2026
- VHT Sep 25, 2026
- FHLC Quarterly
- VHT Quarterly
Distribution history
FHLC vs VHT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FHLC
- VHT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FHLC 14.5%VHT 14.5%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- FHLC 0.83VHT 0.83Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- FHLC −17.7%VHT −17.7%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- FHLC 0.59VHT 0.59Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
FHLC and VHT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

