SKOR ranks 4th and FIGB 34th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
FIGB vs SKOR
SKOR −0.21pt a year
0.36%0.15%
FIGB 1.6×the volume
233K150K
SKOR +1.9pt
−0.2%+1.7%
FIGB vs SKOR Performance
−0.8%+8.8%
- FIGB 0.36%
- SKOR 0.15%, better
- FIGB $686M
- SKOR $1.07B
- FIGB 0.0%
- SKOR +1.1%, better
- FIGB 4.19%
- SKOR 4.77%, better
- FIGB 1220
- SKOR 1344
- FIGB 233K sh, better
- SKOR 150K sh
- FIGB $41.79
- SKOR $47.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FIGB | SKOR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A90 | A93Higher |
| Risk | D33 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | B59 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | F17 | A77Higher |
| Durability | B65 | A76Higher |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. FIGB and SKOR are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FIGBC
SKORA
In short
FIGB The name says investment grade, but Fidelity's managers can also reach into high yield and emerging-market debt while keeping interest-rate risk near the Agg. A credit-picking fund wearing a core-bond duration profile.
SKOR Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the market. SKOR scores every eligible bond on issuer quality and relative value, then weights toward the winners, and stays in the one-to-under-10-year maturity lane.
Stated mandate
FIGB The fund seeks a high level of current income by investing primarily in debt securities across investment-grade, high-yield, and emerging-market segments, while maintaining interest-rate risk similar to the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.
SKOR The Fund seeks to provide pre-fee investment results generally corresponding to the price and yield performance of the Northern Trust US Corporate Bond Quality Value Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FIGB vs SKOR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FIGB vs SKOR Cost
Overpaying FIGB vs SKOR
$4,183
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FIGB 0.36%
$7,320
SKOR 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FIGB | SKOR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $652 | $274 | $378 |
| 20 | $2,522 | $1,071 | $1,451 |
| 30 | $7,320 | $3,137 | $4,183 |
- 0.36%FIGB
- 0.15%SKOR, cheaper
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
SKOR 10th cheapest of 49 funds
FIGB 36th cheapest of 49 funds
FIGB vs SKOR Dividends
- FIGB 4.19%
- SKOR 4.77%, better
- FIGB $1.76
- SKOR $2.26
- FIGB $0.15
- SKOR $0.20
- FIGB Oct 29, 2026
- SKOR Nov 2, 2026
- FIGB Nov 2, 2026
- SKOR Nov 6, 2026
- FIGB Monthly
- SKOR Monthly
Distribution history
FIGB vs SKOR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FIGB
- SKOR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FIGB 6.0%SKOR 4.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FIGB 0.17SKOR 0.44, better
- Worst fall
- FIGB −17.7%SKOR −14.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FIGB 1.02SKOR 0.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.36% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.