Skip to content

FJAN vs ZALT

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January

FJANCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.16pt a year

FJAN0.85%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 6.3×the volume

FJAN21.8KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

FJAN +5.8pt

FJAN+16.4%ZALT+10.6%

FJAN vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.4%FJAN+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FJAN +11.4%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FJAN 0.85%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
FJAN $1.48B
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
FJAN +11.4%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
FJAN 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
FJAN 21.8K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
FJAN $56.43
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FJAN: Cost 11, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 62, Durability 86. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for FJAN, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFJANZALT
Cost30% weightF11A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC53A79Higher
Tradability15% weightA77HigherB65
Holdings10% weightB62A90Higher
Durability5% weightA86HigherB61

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FJAN and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and FJAN 53rd of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 49CXBFRInnovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETFScore 45
  4. Rank 53CFJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 44
  5. Rank 53CFNOVFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FJANCFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

FJAN A defined slice of SPY: the first 10% of losses absorbed, the upside capped, the whole deal rewritten every January for a fresh 12 months. One of twelve monthly-dated siblings in First Trust's buffer lineup, so the start date is yours to pick.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

FJAN The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust up to a stated upside cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses during the current outcome period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • FJAN The payoff is spelled out in advance: first 10% of SPY's price decline absorbed, upside capped at a stated level, terms reset each January for the next 12 months.ftportfolios.com
  • Twelve dated siblings run the same 10% buffer (FFEB, FMAR, FAPR and on down the calendar), so money can be laddered across start months instead of riding one January entry.ftportfolios.com
  • Live since 2021 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it has cycled through repeated annual resets rather than a single outcome window.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • FJAN 0.85% a year is the price of the options package. Cheaper builds of the same buffer idea exist, including ZALT at 0.69% and BUFB at 0.10%.
  • Buy mid-period and you get whatever cap and buffer remain, not the headline terms. The stated 10% runs reset to reset, not from your purchase date.ftportfolios.com
  • Thinly traded for its size, so limit orders earn their keep. It is built around price outcomes, not a distribution stream.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full FJAN profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

FJAN vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FJAN vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying FJAN vs ZALT

$2,770

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FJAN 0.85%

    $16,199

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FJAN 0.85%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FJAN $16,199ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearFJANZALTOverpaying
10$1,508$1,232$276
20$5,706$4,697$1,009
30$16,199$13,429$2,770

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%FJAN
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

FJAN 60th cheapest of 77 funds

FJAN vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
FJAN None
ZALT None

Distribution history

FJANAll FJAN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FJAN vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FJAN 7.6%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FJAN 1.45ZALT 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FJAN −13.6%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FJAN 0.58ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • FJANCvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FJANCvsTENJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FJANCvsSIXJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.