Skip to content

FJUN vs ZALT

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June

FJUNCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.16pt a year

FJUN0.85%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 3.8×the volume

FJUN36.8KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

FJUN +4.4pt

FJUN+15.0%ZALT+10.6%

FJUN vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.1%FJUN+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FJUN +8.1%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FJUN 0.85%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
FJUN $1.43B
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
FJUN +8.1%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
FJUN 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
FJUN 36.8K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
FJUN $60.85
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FJUN: Cost 11, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 66, Holdings 65, Durability 88. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for FJUN, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFJUNZALT
Cost30% weightF11A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightB55A79Higher
Tradability15% weightB66HigherB65
Holdings10% weightB65A90Higher
Durability5% weightA88HigherB61

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FJUN and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and FJUN 55th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 53CFNOVFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 44
  4. Rank 55CFJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - JuneScore 43
  5. Rank 56COCTZTrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FJUNCFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

FJUN First Trust's June-dated buffer fund. It follows the price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, absorbs the first 10% of a decline over each one-year period, and trades that cushion for an upside cap reset every June.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

FJUN The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to a 16.45% upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses during the June 22, 2026–June 17, 2027 outcome period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • FJUN The contract is plain English: the fund takes the first 10% of a drop over the outcome period, and the ceiling on gains is set fresh at each June reset.ftportfolios.com
  • One of twelve monthly-dated siblings on the same reference fund, so entry dates can be laddered across the calendar instead of hinging on one June-to-June window.
  • Running since 2020 and among the larger funds in the buffer aisle, it has rolled through multiple full reset cycles in live markets.
  • A standard 1940 Act ETF: ordinary brokerage account, no options approval, no margin agreement, no K-1 at tax time.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • FJUN At 0.85% a year it sits toward the pricier end of the buffer shelf. Laddered and quarterly-reset rivals charge less (BUFB 0.10%, ZALT 0.69%).
  • Buffer and cap are period math, not daily math. Buy mid-period and your real cushion and remaining headroom differ from the stated terms.
  • It tracks price only, so S&P 500 dividends sit outside the return, distributions have not been part of the package, and losses past the first 10% are yours.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full FJUN profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

FJUN vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FJUN vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying FJUN vs ZALT

$2,770

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FJUN 0.85%

    $16,199

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FJUN 0.85%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FJUN $16,199ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearFJUNZALTOverpaying
10$1,508$1,232$276
20$5,706$4,697$1,009
30$16,199$13,429$2,770

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%FJUN
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

FJUN 60th cheapest of 77 funds

FJUN vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
FJUN None
ZALT None

Distribution history

FJUNAll FJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FJUN vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FJUN 7.3%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FJUN 1.36ZALT 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FJUN −13.3%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FJUN 0.58ZALT 0.29

FJUN and ZALT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FJUNCvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FJUNCvsTENJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FJUNCvsSIXJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.