ISWN ranks 3rd and FLAO 10th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.
FLAO vs ISWN
ISWN −0.25pt a year
0.74%0.49%
ISWN 3.4×the volume
5831.97K
FLAO vs ISWN Performance
+1.5%+3.7%
- FLAO 0.74%
- ISWN 0.49%, better
- FLAO $9M
- ISWN $35M
- FLAO +1.5%
- ISWN +3.7%, better
- FLAO
- ISWN 3.06%
- FLAO 3
- ISWN 14
- FLAO 583 sh
- ISWN 1.97K sh, better
- FLAO $28.68
- ISWN $21.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLAO | ISWN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C45Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | C49 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | D39 | C53Higher |
| Durability | B60 | A80Higher |
Rank among Other Floor Protected funds
Same Category. FLAO and ISWN are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLAOC
ISWNA
In short
FLAO Six-month defined-outcome exposure to the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust: a cap on the upside, 5 points of loss protection under it, and a fresh reset every April and October, at a fee below the protected-outcome median.
ISWN Most downside-protection funds pay for the cushion by capping your upside. ISWN skips the cap: roughly 90% sits in Treasuries while about 10% buys long-dated in-the-money calls on EFA, so developed-market exposure arrives through options.
Stated mandate
FLAO The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust during the outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against losses of up to 5%.
ISWN The fund seeks to track a rules-based index combining U.S. Treasury securities with EFA options. Its strategy targets approximately 90% Treasury exposure to cushion severe, rare market disruptions while retaining some participation in EFA gains.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLAO vs ISWN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLAO vs ISWN Cost
Overpaying FLAO vs ISWN
$4,515
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLAO 0.74%
$14,307
ISWN 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLAO | ISWN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $883 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,394 | $1,621 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $9,792 | $4,515 |
- 0.74%FLAO
- 0.49%ISWN, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
- Median 0.79%
ISWN cheapest of 18 funds
FLAO 8th cheapest of 18 funds
FLAO vs ISWN Dividends
- FLAO
- ISWN 3.06%
- FLAO None
- ISWN $0.65
- FLAO
- ISWN $0.17
- FLAO
- ISWN Sep 29, 2026
- FLAO
- ISWN Sep 30, 2026
- FLAO
- ISWN Quarterly
Distribution history
FLAO vs ISWN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLAO 6.5%ISWN 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLAO 0.37ISWN 0.54
- Worst fall
- FLAO −10.1%ISWN −31.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FLAO 0.48ISWN 0.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.