WTV ranks 1st and FLCV 9th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
FLCV vs WTV
WTV −0.20pt a year
0.32%0.12%
WTV 3.4×the volume
49.3K167K
FLCV vs WTV Performance
+26.5%+20.9%
- FLCV 0.32%
- WTV 0.12%, better
- FLCV $235M
- WTV $3.33B
- FLCV +26.5%, better
- WTV +20.9%
- FLCV 0.68%
- WTV 2.00%, better
- FLCV 130
- WTV 126
- FLCV 49.3K sh
- WTV 167K sh, better
- FLCV $38.01
- WTV $106.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLCV | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A73Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | B57 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | B68 | A84Higher |
| Durability | C47 | A90Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. FLCV and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLCVA
WTVA
In short
FLCV Federated Hermes took MDT Advisers, its quant arm of 30-plus years, and bottled that process into an ETF: a bottom-up model re-ranks large-cap US stocks daily and holds roughly 120 of the undervalued ones.
WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.
Stated mandate
FLCV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in common stocks of large-cap U.S. companies that are considered undervalued.
WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLCV vs WTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLCV vs WTV Cost
Overpaying FLCV vs WTV
$4,022
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLCV 0.32%
$6,542
WTV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLCV | WTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $580 | $220 | $360 |
| 20 | $2,250 | $859 | $1,391 |
| 30 | $6,542 | $2,520 | $4,022 |
- 0.32%FLCV
- 0.12%WTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
WTV cheapest of 64 funds
FLCV 12th cheapest of 64 funds
FLCV vs WTV Dividends
- FLCV 0.68%
- WTV 2.00%, better
- FLCV $0.26
- WTV $2.14
- FLCV $0.26
- WTV $0.55
- FLCV Dec 31, 2025
- WTV Sep 25, 2026
- FLCV Jan 2, 2026
- WTV Sep 29, 2026
- FLCV Irregular
- WTV Quarterly
Distribution history
FLCV vs WTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLCV 11.8%WTV 13.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLCV 1.24WTV 1.33
- Worst fall
- FLCV −15.9%WTV −19.3%
- Market sensitivity
- FLCV 0.74WTV 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.32% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.