SPAB ranks 2nd and FLIA 56th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
FLIA vs SPAB
SPAB −0.22pt a year
0.25%0.03%
SPAB 10.7×the volume
291K3.11M
FLIA +1.2pt
+1.0%−0.2%
FLIA vs SPAB Performance
+5.1%−0.9%
- FLIA 0.25%
- SPAB 0.03%, better
- FLIA $436M
- SPAB $10.4B
- FLIA +1.0%, better
- SPAB −0.2%
- FLIA 3.24%
- SPAB 4.20%, better
- FLIA 99
- SPAB 8697
- FLIA 291K sh
- SPAB 3.11M sh, better
- FLIA $20.19
- SPAB $24.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLIA | SPAB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B64 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B69Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | B56 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | A76Higher |
| Durability | B64 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. FLIA and SPAB are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLIAB
SPABA
In short
FLIA Bonds from everywhere except America, with the currency swings hedged away. FLIA holds non-dollar debt against the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Hedged benchmark, at a fee below what the typical aggregate bond ETF charges.
SPAB A 2007-vintage core bond fund priced at 0.03%: roughly 8,500 US investment-grade bonds in one ticket, at the same rock-bottom fee the household names charge for the same index.
Stated mandate
FLIA The Fund seeks total return through an international aggregate fixed-income strategy. Its mandate includes exposure to non-U.S.-dollar-denominated securities and currency-management techniques intended to hedge foreign-currency exposure.
SPAB The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index before fees and expenses, providing broad exposure to U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLIA vs SPAB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLIA vs SPAB Cost
Overpaying FLIA vs SPAB
$4,521
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLIA 0.25%
$5,159
SPAB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLIA | SPAB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $55 | $400 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $216 | $1,553 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $638 | $4,521 |
- 0.25%FLIA
- 0.03%SPAB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SPAB 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
FLIA 39th cheapest of 114 funds
FLIA vs SPAB Dividends
- FLIA 3.24%
- SPAB 4.20%, better
- FLIA $0.66
- SPAB $1.04
- FLIA $0.07
- SPAB $0.09
- FLIA Oct 1, 2026
- SPAB Oct 1, 2026
- FLIA Oct 6, 2026
- SPAB Oct 6, 2026
- FLIA Monthly
- SPAB Monthly
Distribution history
FLIA vs SPAB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLIA
- SPAB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLIA 3.5%, betterSPAB 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLIA −0.15SPAB 0.17, better
- Worst fall
- FLIA −8.8%, betterSPAB −17.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FLIA 0.46SPAB 1.00
FLIA and SPAB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

