ISWN ranks 3rd and FLJJ 9th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.
FLJJ vs ISWN
ISWN −0.25pt a year
0.74%0.49%
ISWN 3.5×the volume
5671.97K
FLJJ vs ISWN Performance
+8.7%+2.4%
- FLJJ 0.74%
- ISWN 0.49%, better
- FLJJ $9M
- ISWN $35M
- FLJJ +8.7%, better
- ISWN +2.4%
- FLJJ
- ISWN 3.09%
- FLJJ 2
- ISWN 14
- FLJJ 567 sh
- ISWN 1.97K sh, better
- FLJJ $34.62
- ISWN $21.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLJJ | ISWN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A76Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | C50 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | D37 | C53Higher |
| Durability | C53 | A81Higher |
Rank among Other Floor Protected funds
Same Category. FLJJ and ISWN are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLJJB
ISWNA
In short
FLJJ Most protected-outcome funds absorb your first 5% of losses. This one draws the line at 5% instead: FLEX options on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, downside limited beyond 5%, upside capped, terms reset every six months.
ISWN Most downside-protection funds pay for the cushion by capping your upside. ISWN skips the cap: roughly 90% sits in Treasuries while about 10% buys long-dated in-the-money calls on EFA, so developed-market exposure arrives through options.
Stated mandate
FLJJ The Fund uses FLEX Options referencing the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust to seek matching returns through an outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against losses beyond 5%.
ISWN The fund seeks to track a rules-based index combining U.S. Treasury securities with EFA options. Its strategy targets approximately 90% Treasury exposure to cushion severe, rare market disruptions while retaining some participation in EFA gains.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLJJ vs ISWN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLJJ vs ISWN Cost
Overpaying FLJJ vs ISWN
$4,515
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLJJ 0.74%
$14,307
ISWN 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLJJ | ISWN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $883 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,394 | $1,621 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $9,792 | $4,515 |
- 0.74%FLJJ
- 0.49%ISWN, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
- Median 0.79%
ISWN cheapest of 18 funds
FLJJ 8th cheapest of 18 funds
FLJJ vs ISWN Dividends
- FLJJ
- ISWN 3.09%
- FLJJ None
- ISWN $0.65
- FLJJ
- ISWN $0.17
- FLJJ
- ISWN Sep 29, 2026
- FLJJ
- ISWN Sep 30, 2026
- FLJJ
- ISWN Quarterly
Distribution history
FLJJ vs ISWN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLJJ 6.0%ISWN 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLJJ 1.09ISWN 0.54
- Worst fall
- FLJJ −6.9%ISWN −31.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FLJJ 0.48ISWN 0.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.