FLJP ranks 1st and JPXN 5th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.
FLJP vs JPXN
FLJP −0.39pt a year
0.09%0.48%
FLJP 59.3×the volume
976K16.5K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+9.2%+9.2%
FLJP vs JPXN Performance
+55.0%+55.0%
- FLJP 0.09%, better
- JPXN 0.48%
- FLJP $4.27B
- JPXN $166M
- FLJP +16.4%
- JPXN +17.7%, better
- FLJP 4.26%, better
- JPXN 2.74%
- FLJP 447
- JPXN 402
- FLJP 976K sh, better
- JPXN 16.5K sh
- FLJP $39.98
- JPXN $100.45
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLJP | JPXN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B68 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C48 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | A71Higher | B64 |
| Holdings | A74 | A82Higher |
| Durability | B61 | A70Higher |
Rank among Japan funds
Same Category. FLJP and JPXN are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLJPA
JPXNA
In short
FLJP Japan's whole market for nine basis points. FLJP tracks the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index across roughly 500 stocks at 0.09%, a fraction of what the typical Japan fund charges.
JPXN Most Japan ETFs just buy Tokyo. JPXN follows the JPX-Nikkei 400, an index that screens for profitability and shareholder-oriented practices, making it the corporate-reform cut of Japan rather than plain country beta.
Stated mandate
FLJP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index.
JPXN JPXN seeks to follow an index of Japanese equities that applies profitability and shareholder-oriented practice screens. It is intended to provide targeted exposure to Japan as a single-country allocation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLJP vs JPXN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLJP vs JPXN Cost
Overpaying JPXN vs FLJP
$7,707
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLJP 0.09%
$1,898
JPXN 0.48%
$9,605
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLJP | JPXN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $865 | $700 |
| 20 | $646 | $3,328 | $2,682 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $9,605 | $7,707 |
- 0.09%FLJP, cheaper
- 0.48%JPXN
- Middle half of Japan funds
- Median 0.54%
FLJP cheapest of 18 funds
JPXN 6th cheapest of 18 funds
FLJP vs JPXN Dividends
- FLJP 4.26%, better
- JPXN 2.74%
- FLJP $1.69
- JPXN $2.75
- FLJP $0.17
- JPXN $0.64
- FLJP Jun 26, 2026
- JPXN Jun 15, 2026
- FLJP Jul 6, 2026
- JPXN Jun 18, 2026
- FLJP Twice a year
- JPXN Twice a year
Distribution history
FLJP vs JPXN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLJP
- JPXN
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLJP 12.5%JPXN 12.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FLJP 1.17JPXN 1.21, better
- Worst fall
- FLJP −28.8%, betterJPXN −29.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FLJP 0.96JPXN 0.85
FLJP and JPXN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
