ICSH ranks 1st and FLUD 24th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
FLUD vs ICSH
ICSH −0.07pt a year
0.15%0.08%
ICSH 7.6×the volume
217K1.64M
FLUD +0.1pt
+4.0%+3.9%
FLUD vs ICSH Performance
+21.4%+21.3%
- FLUD 0.15%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- FLUD $642M
- ICSH $8.97B
- FLUD +4.0%, better
- ICSH +3.6%
- FLUD 4.03%
- ICSH 4.13%, better
- FLUD 472
- ICSH 408
- FLUD 217K sh
- ICSH 1.64M sh, better
- FLUD $24.99
- ICSH $50.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLUD | ICSH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C52 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | A83 | A95Higher |
| Durability | B69 | A90Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. FLUD and ICSH are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLUDA
ICSHA
In short
FLUD An actively run parking spot for cash. Franklin's ultra-short bond fund works the front end of the curve for income while emphasizing lower volatility, pays out monthly, and charges less than the typical fund in its cash-alternative group.
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
Stated mandate
FLUD The fund seeks income and capital appreciation while emphasizing lower volatility.
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLUD vs ICSH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLUD vs ICSH Cost
Overpaying FLUD vs ICSH
$1,448
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLUD 0.15%
$3,137
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLUD | ICSH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $147 | $127 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $575 | $496 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $1,689 | $1,448 |
- 0.15%FLUD
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
FLUD 23rd cheapest of 78 funds
FLUD vs ICSH Dividends
- FLUD 4.03%
- ICSH 4.13%, better
- FLUD $1.01
- ICSH $2.08
- FLUD $0.09
- ICSH $0.17
- FLUD Oct 1, 2026
- ICSH Oct 1, 2026
- FLUD Oct 6, 2026
- ICSH Oct 6, 2026
- FLUD Monthly
- ICSH Monthly
Distribution history
FLUD vs ICSH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLUD
- ICSH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLUD 0.5%ICSH 0.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FLUD 1.18, betterICSH 0.87
- Worst fall
- FLUD −1.5%ICSH −0.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FLUD 0.03ICSH 0.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.