WTV ranks 1st and FLV 15th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
FLV vs WTV
11.4%by weight
WTV −0.30pt a year
0.42%0.12%
WTV 21.2×the volume
8.13K173K
WTV +2.4pt
+11.0%+13.4%
FLV vs WTV Performance
+68.7%+87.2%
- FLV 0.42%
- WTV 0.12%, better
- FLV $397M
- WTV $3.35B
- FLV +24.3%, better
- WTV +21.6%
- FLV 1.59%
- WTV 1.99%, better
- FLV 49
- WTV 126
- FLV 8.13K sh
- WTV 173K sh, better
- FLV $87.97
- WTV $105.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLV | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A73Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | C44 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | A84Higher |
| Durability | A70 | A89Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. FLV and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLVB
WTVA
In short
FLV An active, roughly 50-stock take on large-cap value: American Century's managers hunt high-dividend U.S. companies with room to raise the payout, and charge less than the typical active value fund to do it.
WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.
Stated mandate
FLV The fund seeks current income and long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in high-dividend U.S. companies with potential for dividend growth.
WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLV vs WTV Holdings
How FLV and WTV differ
11.4%
Shared holdings make up 25.3% of FLV and 11.4% of WTV.
Level by level
- Holdings11.4%
- Sector85.7%
- Country92.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in FLVMore in WTV | Gap | FLV | WTV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Communication | WTV +6.6 points | 1.2% | 7.8% | |
| Health Care | FLV +6.3 points | 15.6% | 9.3% | |
| Real Estate | WTV +4.4 points | 0.0% | 4.3% | |
| Industrials | FLV +3.6 points | 12.2% | 8.6% | |
| Consumer Staples | FLV +2.3 points | 11.2% | 8.9% | |
| Financials | WTV +2.0 points | 20.2% | 22.2% | |
| Energy | FLV +1.5 points | 8.7% | 7.2% | |
| Technology | WTV +1.0 points | 16.6% | 17.6% | |
| Utilities | FLV +0.6 points | 5.2% | 4.6% | |
| Materials | WTV +0.3 points | 2.6% | 2.9% | |
| Consumer Discretionary | FLV +0.1 points | 6.6% | 6.5% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in FLVMore in WTV | Gap | FLV | WTV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | WTV +7.5 points | 92.0% | 99.5% | |
| France | FLV +2.8 points | 2.8% | 0.0% | |
| United Kingdom | FLV +2.1 points | 2.1% | 0.0% | |
| China | FLV +1.8 points | 1.8% | 0.0% | |
| Switzerland | FLV +1.4 points | 1.4% | 0.0% | |
| Sweden | WTV +0.6 points | 0.0% | 0.6% |
Concentration
- FLV34.8%
- WTV20.9%
- FLV48
- WTV124
Asset class
- FLV
- Stocks
- WTV
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in FLV35
- In both13
- Only in WTV111
Only in FLV
35 securities, 74.1% of FLV by weight
- Microsoft Corp5.31%
- Amazon.com Inc3.69%
- Marsh & McLennan Cos Inc3.69%
- Apple Inc3.42%
- Berkshire Hathaway Inc3.24%
- Blackrock Inc3.08%
- Johnson & Johnson3.07%
- JPMorgan Chase & Co2.63%
- ONEOK Inc2.62%
- Medtronic PLC2.44%
- PepsiCo Inc2.30%
- Baker Hughes Co2.29%
- Truist Financial Corp2.27%
- A O Smith Corp2.06%
- Unilever PLC2.05%
- Norfolk Southern Corp2.05%
- Analog Devices Inc1.88%
- TE Connectivity PLC1.74%
- Colgate-Palmolive Co1.70%
- Sanofi SA1.66%
- Packaging Corp of America1.63%
- Henry Schein Inc1.58%
- Estee Lauder Cos Inc/The1.58%
- IQVIA Holdings Inc1.57%
- Reinsurance Group of America Inc1.54%
- Commerce Bancshares Inc/MO1.53%
- Atmos Energy Corp1.51%
- Amrize Ltd1.44%
- Honeywell Aerospace Inc1.42%
- RTX Corp1.42%
- Rockwell Automation Inc1.32%
- Alphabet Inc1.21%
- PulteGroup Inc1.20%
- TotalEnergies SE1.10%
- Mondelez International Inc0.86%
Only in WTV
111 securities, 88.5% of WTV by weight
- Nvidia Corp2.95%
- Berkshire Hathaway Inc2.91%
- Salesforce Inc2.10%
- Newmont Mining Corp1.99%
- Target Corp1.94%
- Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc1.79%
- Merck & Co Inc/NJ1.77%
- Southwest Airlines Co1.60%
- Citigroup Inc1.50%
- Altria Group Inc1.37%
- priceline.com Inc1.28%
- Meta PlatformsInc. Cl A1.26%
- Adobe Inc1.24%
- Ryder System Inc1.19%
- ConocoPhillips1.19%
- Coca-Cola Consolidated Inc1.18%
- Verizon Communications Inc1.16%
- Healthpeak Properties Inc1.15%
- Morgan Stanley1.13%
- NetFlix Inc1.12%
- Molson Coors Beverage Co1.06%
- Regions Financial Corp0.98%
- Rexford Industrial Realty Inc0.97%
- Cigna Corp0.97%
- Zoom Video Communications-A0.96%
- Affiliated Managers Group Inc0.96%
- Edison International0.94%
- HCA Healthcare Inc0.93%
- Exxonmobil Holdings Corp0.93%
- Match Group Inc0.91%
- Halliburton Co0.91%
- AT&T Inc0.89%
- Franklin Resources Inc0.89%
- Kraft Foods Inc0.89%
- Pfizer Inc0.86%
- Maplebear Inc0.82%
- Travelers Cos Inc/The0.81%
- Kroger Co/The0.80%
- Paycom Software Inc0.80%
- Bank of New York Mellon Corp0.79%
- Progressive Corp/The0.78%
- Darden Restaurants Inc0.77%
- Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Co0.77%
- Alexandria Real Estate Equities0.76%
- Cognizant Technology Solutions0.75%
- Valero Energy Corp0.75%
- Phillips 660.75%
- Walt Disney Co/The0.74%
- Lineage Inc0.74%
- Dell Technologies -C0.73%
Weight gaps
All 13 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in FLVMore in WTV | Gap | FLV | WTV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke Energy Corp | FLV +2.95 points | 3.62% | 0.67% | |
| Becton Dickinson & Co | FLV +2.13 points | 3.01% | 0.88% | |
| Kimberly-Clark Corp | FLV +1.91 points | 2.64% | 0.73% | |
| Charles Schwab Corp/The | FLV +1.57 points | 2.05% | 0.48% | |
| UnitedHealth Group Inc | FLV +0.96 points | 2.13% | 1.17% | |
| Honeywell International Inc | FLV +0.90 points | 1.34% | 0.44% | |
| Equifax Inc | FLV +0.80 points | 1.32% | 0.52% | |
| PPG Industries Inc | FLV +0.68 points | 1.14% | 0.46% | |
| Owens Corning | FLV +0.64 points | 1.19% | 0.55% | |
| Roper Technologies Inc | FLV +0.53 points | 1.25% | 0.72% | |
| Chevron Corp | FLV +0.41 points | 2.67% | 2.26% | |
| QUALCOMM Inc | FLV +0.27 points | 1.23% | 0.96% | |
| Cisco Systems Inc | FLV +0.10 points | 1.68% | 1.58% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLV vs WTV Cost
Overpaying FLV vs WTV
$5,952
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLV 0.42%
$8,472
WTV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLV | WTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $759 | $220 | $539 |
| 20 | $2,927 | $859 | $2,068 |
| 30 | $8,472 | $2,520 | $5,952 |
- 0.42%FLV
- 0.12%WTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.55%
WTV cheapest of 64 funds
FLV 20th cheapest of 64 funds
FLV vs WTV Dividends
- FLV 1.59%
- WTV 1.99%, better
- FLV $1.42
- WTV $2.14
- FLV $0.35
- WTV $0.55
- FLV Sep 8, 2026
- WTV Sep 25, 2026
- FLV Sep 10, 2026
- WTV Sep 29, 2026
- FLV Quarterly
- WTV Quarterly
Distribution history
FLV vs WTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLV
- WTV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLV 12.2%, betterWTV 13.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLV 1.10WTV 1.33, better
- Worst fall
- FLV −15.1%, betterWTV −19.3%
- Market sensitivity
- FLV 0.53WTV 0.94
FLV and WTV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.42% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
