Skip to content

FLV vs WTV

American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF

FLVBNYSE Arca

WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

WTVANYSE Arca

Overlap

11.4%by weight

Expense ratio

WTV −0.30pt a year

FLV0.42%WTV0.12%

Avg volume · 30D

WTV 21.2×the volume

FLV8.13KWTV173K

5Y return · a year

WTV +2.4pt

FLV+11.0%WTV+13.4%

FLV vs WTV Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+68.7%FLV+87.2%WTV

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. FLV +68.7%. WTV +87.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FLV 0.42%
WTV 0.12%, better
Fund size
FLV $397M
WTV $3.35B
1Y total return
FLV +24.3%, better
WTV +21.6%
Yield (12M)
FLV 1.59%
WTV 1.99%, better
Holdings
FLV 49
WTV 126
Avg volume (30D)
FLV 8.13K sh
WTV 173K sh, better
NAV per share
FLV $87.97
WTV $105.97
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FLV: Cost 70, Risk 73, Mission not scored, Tradability 44, Holdings 52, Durability 70. WTV: Cost 100, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings 84, Durability 89.
Pillar letters and Scores for FLV, WTV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFLVWTV
Cost30% weightA70A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA73HigherB57
Tradability15% weightC44A88Higher
Holdings10% weightC52A84Higher
Durability5% weightA70A89Higher

Rank among US Active Value funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FLV and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Value⁠

Category · 64 funds
See all 64 ›

WTV ranks 1st and FLV 15th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 1AWTVWisdomTree U.S. Value FundScore 86
  3. Rank 3ASEIVSEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETFScore 84
  4. Rank 15BCGVVCapital Group U.S. Large Value ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 15BFLVAmerican Century Focused Large Cap Value ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 17BACVUHartford Quality Value ETFScore 62

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FLVBAmerican Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF

WTVAWisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

In short

FLV An active, roughly 50-stock take on large-cap value: American Century's managers hunt high-dividend U.S. companies with room to raise the payout, and charge less than the typical active value fund to do it.

WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.

Stated mandate

FLV The fund seeks current income and long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in high-dividend U.S. companies with potential for dividend growth.

WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.

Why people hold it

  • FLV At 0.42%, it costs less than the typical active U.S. value fund, where the peer median sits at 0.55%. More of the dividend stream stays in the fund.
  • Two jobs, one mandate: current income and long-term capital appreciation from high-dividend U.S. companies with dividend growth potential. Distributions run quarterly.
  • About 50 holdings, filtered through valuation and quality screens, so cheap on its own doesn't earn a stock a spot.americancentury.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded active U.S. value field, one of the stronger implementations among dozens of rivals.
  • WTV Charges 0.12% a year, under a quarter of the 0.55% typical for active US value funds, and less than every same-benchmark rival in its group (JAVA 0.44%, CGVV 0.33%, TEQI 0.54%).
  • "Value" here means cash returned: dividend yield plus net buyback yield, with quality and profitability screens, rather than a plain low price-to-book sort.wisdomtree.com
  • About 160 US stocks, a multi-billion-dollar asset base, and a live track record dating to 2007. Distributions land quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • FLV Thinly traded next to the category's giants. Spreads can be wider, and bigger orders take more care at the point of execution.
  • Systematic rivals cost less: AVLV and SEIV at 0.15%, DFLV at 0.21%. The gap is what you pay for a manager's judgment instead of a rules engine.
  • It's active, measured against the Russell 1000 Value Index. A 50-stock portfolio can look quite different from that benchmark in either direction.americancentury.com
  • WTV Full equity with no downside cushion, and a value tilt that can lean into a handful of sectors. Risk is the least polished part of the profile.
  • Rules-based active, not an index tracker, so results can diverge from the Russell 1000 Value in either direction.
  • Buybacks supply much of the shareholder yield, and companies can scale repurchases back more easily than they cut dividends.wisdomtree.com

Full FLV profile⁠

Full WTV profile⁠

FLV vs WTV Holdings

How FLV and WTV differ

Overlap by weight

11.4%

Shared holdings make up 25.3% of FLV and 11.4% of WTV.

Level by level

  • Holdings13 in both11.4%
  • Sector11 Sectors85.7%
  • Countryby domicile92.0%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in FLV and WTV, widest gap first
SectorMore in FLVMore in WTVGap
CommunicationWTV +6.6 points
Health CareFLV +6.3 points
Real EstateWTV +4.4 points
IndustrialsFLV +3.6 points
Consumer StaplesFLV +2.3 points
FinancialsWTV +2.0 points
EnergyFLV +1.5 points
TechnologyWTV +1.0 points
UtilitiesFLV +0.6 points
MaterialsWTV +0.3 points
Consumer DiscretionaryFLV +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FLV and WTV, widest gap first
CountryMore in FLVMore in WTVGap
United StatesWTV +7.5 points
FranceFLV +2.8 points
United KingdomFLV +2.1 points
ChinaFLV +1.8 points
SwitzerlandFLV +1.4 points
SwedenWTV +0.6 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FLV34.8%
  • WTV20.9%

Securities held

  • FLV48
  • WTV124

Asset class

FLV
Stocks
WTV
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in FLV35
  • In both13
  • Only in WTV111

Only in FLV

35 securities, 74.1% of FLV by weight

  • Microsoft Corp5.31%
  • Amazon.com Inc3.69%
  • Marsh & McLennan Cos Inc3.69%

Only in WTV

111 securities, 88.5% of WTV by weight

  • Nvidia Corp2.95%
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc2.91%
  • Salesforce Inc2.10%

Weight gaps

All 13 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FLV and WTV, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FLVMore in WTVGap
Duke Energy CorpDUKFLV +2.95 points
Becton Dickinson & CoBDXFLV +2.13 points
Kimberly-Clark CorpKMBFLV +1.91 points
Charles Schwab Corp/TheSCHWFLV +1.57 points
UnitedHealth Group IncUNHFLV +0.96 points
Honeywell International IncHONFLV +0.90 points
Equifax IncEFXFLV +0.80 points
PPG Industries IncPPGFLV +0.68 points

All 48 FLV holdings⁠All 157 WTV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FLV vs WTV Cost

Overpaying FLV vs WTV

$5,952

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FLV 0.42%

    $8,472

  • WTV 0.12%

    $2,520

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FLV 0.42%
  • WTV 0.12%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530FLV $8,472WTV $2,520

Year by year

YearFLVWTVOverpaying
10$759$220$539
20$2,927$859$2,068
30$8,472$2,520$5,952

Expense ratio

  • 0.42%FLV
  • 0.12%WTV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Value funds
  • Median 0.55%

WTV cheapest of 64 funds

FLV 20th cheapest of 64 funds

FLV vs WTV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
FLV 1.59%
WTV 1.99%, better
Payout (12M)
FLV $1.42
WTV $2.14
Last payment
FLV $0.35
WTV $0.55
Ex-dividend
FLV Sep 8, 2026
WTV Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
FLV Sep 10, 2026
WTV Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
FLV Quarterly
WTV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FLVQuarterly · 26 paymentsAll FLV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 26 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 23, 2020 $0.06; Sep 22, 2020 $0.23; Dec 17, 2020 $0.19; Mar 23, 2021 $0.26; Jun 22, 2021 $0.27; Sep 21, 2021 $0.30; Dec 16, 2021 $1.64; Mar 22, 2022 $0.33; Jun 21, 2022 $0.29; Sep 20, 2022 $0.34; Dec 15, 2022 $1.97; Mar 23, 2023 $0.32; Jun 20, 2023 $0.30; Sep 21, 2023 $0.34; Dec 18, 2023 $0.30; Mar 21, 2024 $0.39; Jun 24, 2024 $0.36; Sep 23, 2024 $0.21; Dec 17, 2024 $0.42; Mar 25, 2025 $0.31; Jun 24, 2025 $0.45; Sep 23, 2025 $0.22; Dec 16, 2025 $0.46; Mar 10, 2026 $0.21; Jun 9, 2026 $0.41; Sep 8, 2026 $0.35. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD
WTVQuarterly · 43 paymentsAll WTV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 43 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 27, 2017 $0.11; Jun 26, 2017 $0.15; Sep 26, 2017 $0.15; Dec 26, 2017 $0.17; Mar 20, 2018 $0.11; Jun 25, 2018 $0.16; Sep 25, 2018 $0.24; Dec 24, 2018 $0.22; Mar 26, 2019 $0.12; Jun 24, 2019 $0.15; Sep 24, 2019 $0.21; Dec 23, 2019 $0.20; Mar 24, 2020 $0.15; Jun 23, 2020 $0.19; Sep 22, 2020 $0.16; Dec 21, 2020 $0.27; Dec 30, 2020 $0.04; Mar 25, 2021 $0.22; Jun 24, 2021 $0.24; Sep 24, 2021 $0.25; Dec 27, 2021 $0.27; Mar 25, 2022 $0.23; Jun 24, 2022 $0.33; Sep 26, 2022 $0.32; Dec 23, 2022 $0.32; Mar 27, 2023 $0.20; Jun 26, 2023 $0.29; Sep 25, 2023 $0.26; Dec 22, 2023 $0.35; Dec 28, 2023 $0.02; Mar 22, 2024 $0.28; Jun 25, 2024 $0.32; Sep 25, 2024 $0.36; Dec 26, 2024 $0.33; Dec 31, 2024 $0.01; Mar 26, 2025 $0.32; Jun 25, 2025 $0.31; Sep 25, 2025 $0.38; Dec 26, 2025 $0.46; Dec 31, 2025 $0.02; Mar 26, 2026 $0.52; Jun 25, 2026 $0.59; Sep 25, 2026 $0.55. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD

FLV vs WTV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FLV
  • WTV
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: WTV −19.3% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FLV 12.2%, betterWTV 13.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FLV 1.10WTV 1.33, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FLV −15.1%, betterWTV −19.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FLV 0.53WTV 0.94

FLV and WTV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FLVBvsAVLVA

    American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.42% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WTVAvsAVLVA

    WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLVBvsSEIVA

    American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF · SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.42% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WTVAvsSEIVA

    WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLVBvsDFLVA

    American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.42% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WTVAvsDFLVA

    WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.