Skip to content

FMAY vs ZALT

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May

FMAYCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.16pt a year

FMAY0.85%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 5.3×the volume

FMAY25.8KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

FMAY +4.2pt

FMAY+14.8%ZALT+10.6%

FMAY vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.5%FMAY+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FMAY +8.5%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FMAY 0.85%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
FMAY $1.47B
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
FMAY +8.5%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
FMAY 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
FMAY 25.8K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
FMAY $57.09
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FMAY: Cost 11, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 84, Holdings 64, Durability 86. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for FMAY, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFMAYZALT
Cost30% weightF11A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC53A79Higher
Tradability15% weightA84HigherB65
Holdings10% weightB64A90Higher
Durability5% weightA86HigherB61

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FMAY and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and FMAY 44th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 44CFMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - MarchScore 46
  4. Rank 44CFMAYFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - MayScore 46
  5. Rank 49CDHDGFT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETFScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FMAYCFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

FMAY First Trust's May rung on a twelve-month buffer ladder: it absorbs the first 10% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's price losses over a one-year stretch, trades that cushion for an upside cap, then resets every May.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

FMAY The Fund seeks pre-fee, pre-expense returns linked to the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, subject to a 17.09% upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses during the current May outcome period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • FMAY Mechanically simple: across each one-year period it seeks to absorb the first 10% of the reference ETF's price decline, in exchange for an upside cap set at the May reset.ftportfolios.com
  • Twelve monthly siblings (FJAN through FDEC) run the same 10% buffer on the same reference ETF, so entries can be laddered or rolled into a fresh period in any month.ftportfolios.com
  • Built from exchange-listed FLEX options inside an ETF wrapper: daily liquidity, no surrender schedule, no minimum holding term.sec.govftportfolios.com
  • Seasoned by buffer-fund standards: running since 2020 and carrying over a billion dollars, which puts it among the larger, longer-lived funds in this niche.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • FMAY At 0.85% a year it costs more than the typical fund in its buffer peer group, and laddered alternatives such as BUFB charge a fraction of that.
  • It follows price return only, so the reference ETF's dividends are left out, and the stated cap and buffer are quoted before fees and expenses.sec.gov
  • Cap and buffer are designed for holders across the full outcome period; buy mid-period and your own numbers differ. Each May's new cap depends on market rates at the reset.ftportfolios.comsec.gov
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full FMAY profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

FMAY vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FMAY vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying FMAY vs ZALT

$2,770

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FMAY 0.85%

    $16,199

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FMAY 0.85%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FMAY $16,199ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearFMAYZALTOverpaying
10$1,508$1,232$276
20$5,706$4,697$1,009
30$16,199$13,429$2,770

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%FMAY
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

FMAY 60th cheapest of 77 funds

FMAY vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
FMAY None
ZALT None

Distribution history

FMAYAll FMAY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FMAY vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FMAY 7.1%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FMAY 1.37ZALT 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FMAY −13.6%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FMAY 0.58ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • FMAYCvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FMAYCvsTENJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FMAYCvsSIXJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.