FMUB ranks 3rd and JMHI 14th of 18 funds in the High-Yield Municipal Bonds Category.
FMUB vs JMHI
FMUB −0.22pt a year
0.30%0.52%
FMUB 1.4×the volume
97.3K70.7K
FMUB vs JMHI Performance
+1.1%−0.4%
- FMUB 0.30%, better
- JMHI 0.52%
- FMUB $246M
- JMHI $307M
- FMUB +1.1%, better
- JMHI −0.4%
- FMUB 3.58%
- JMHI 4.56%, better
- FMUB 702
- JMHI 261
- FMUB 97.3K sh, better
- JMHI 70.7K sh
- FMUB $49.75
- JMHI $48.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMUB | JMHI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F22 |
| Mission | A89 | A92Higher |
| Risk | B61Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | C41 | C52Higher |
| Holdings | D27 | A70Higher |
| Durability | C49 | A74Higher |
Rank among High-Yield Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. FMUB and JMHI are both graded against the same 18 High-Yield Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMUBA
JMHIC
In short
FMUB Tax-free income is the job, but the mandate also leaves room for capital growth. Fidelity's 2023-vintage muni fund spreads across roughly 400 bonds and pays monthly.
JMHI A 2007-vintage JPMorgan muni strategy that traded its mutual fund shell for an ETF wrapper in 2023. Actively run, free to lean all the way into below-investment-grade munis, built around federally tax-exempt income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
FMUB The fund seeks high current income exempt from federal income tax, with capital growth also considered.
JMHI The Fund seeks a high level of current income exempt from federal income taxes by investing in tax-exempt municipal securities, with an emphasis on high-yield municipal bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMUB vs JMHI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMUB vs JMHI Cost
Overpaying JMHI vs FMUB
$4,202
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMUB 0.30%
$6,149
JMHI 0.52%
$10,351
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMUB | JMHI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $935 | $390 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $3,593 | $1,480 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $10,351 | $4,202 |
- 0.30%FMUB, cheaper
- 0.52%JMHI
- Middle half of High-Yield Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.39%
FMUB cheapest of 18 funds
JMHI 15th cheapest of 18 funds
FMUB vs JMHI Dividends
- FMUB 3.58%
- JMHI 4.56%, better
- FMUB $1.79
- JMHI $2.20
- FMUB $0.12
- JMHI $0.18
- FMUB Oct 29, 2026
- JMHI Oct 1, 2026
- FMUB Pays Nov 2, 2026
- JMHI Oct 5, 2026
- FMUB Monthly
- JMHI Monthly
Distribution history
FMUB vs JMHI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMUB 5.4%JMHI 6.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FMUB 0.04JMHI 0.30
- Worst fall
- FMUB −6.1%JMHI −7.3%
- Market sensitivity
- FMUB 0.91JMHI 0.97
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.