FNG ranks 124th and GOGL 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
FNG vs GOGL
0.0%by weight
GOGL −0.79pt a year
0.99%0.20%
FNG 5.1×the volume
126K24.7K
FNG vs GOGL Performance
−68.1%−37.7%
- FNG 0.99%
- GOGL 0.20%, better
- FNG $3M
- GOGL $4M
- FNG 3
- GOGL 1
- FNG 126K sh, better
- GOGL 24.7K sh
- FNG $2.70
- GOGL $15.61
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FNG | GOGL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A99Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D35 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | C49Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D39Higher | D34 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. FNG and GOGL are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FNGC
GOGLC
In short
FNG Single-stock leverage usually aims at mega-caps. FNG points at Fabrinet, the optical-packaging specialist that assembles fiber-optic gear for data centers, and targets 2x its daily move. A trading tool, reset every session.
Stated mandate
FNG The fund seeks daily returns, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of FN.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FNG vs GOGL Holdings
How FNG and GOGL differ
0.0%
About this figure: FNG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
GOGL gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for FNG and GOGL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in FNGMore in GOGL | Gap | FNG | GOGL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- FNG213.8%
- GOGL199.5%
- FNG1
- GOGL0
Asset class
- FNG
- Stocks
- GOGL
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in FNG1
- In both0
- Only in GOGL0
Only in FNG
1 security, 13.8% of FNG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204013.78%
Only in GOGL
0 securities, 0.0% of GOGL by weight
Weight gaps
FNG and GOGL share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FNG vs GOGL Cost
Overpaying FNG vs GOGL
$14,370
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FNG 0.99%
$18,525
GOGL 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FNG | GOGL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $365 | $1,381 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $1,421 | $5,144 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $4,155 | $14,370 |
- 0.99%FNG
- 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GOGL cheapest of 312 funds
FNG 169th cheapest of 312 funds
FNG vs GOGL Dividends
- FNG None
- GOGL None
Distribution history
FNG vs GOGL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- FNG −1.55GOGL −3.37
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.