Skip to content

FNOV vs ZALT

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November

FNOVCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.16pt a year

FNOV0.85%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 7.5×the volume

FNOV18.4KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

FNOV +6.0pt

FNOV+16.6%ZALT+10.6%

FNOV vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+12.4%FNOV+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FNOV +12.4%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FNOV 0.85%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
FNOV $1.27B
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
FNOV +12.4%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
FNOV 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
FNOV 18.4K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
FNOV $60.21
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FNOV: Cost 11, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 80, Holdings 59, Durability 89. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for FNOV, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFNOVZALT
Cost30% weightF11A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC51A79Higher
Tradability15% weightA80HigherB65
Holdings10% weightB59A90Higher
Durability5% weightA89HigherB61

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FNOV and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and FNOV 53rd of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 53CFJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 44
  4. Rank 53CFNOVFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 44
  5. Rank 55CFJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - JuneScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FNOVCFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

FNOV One of the original November-reset buffer funds: since 2019 it has run a rolling 12-month claim on SPY's price, absorbing the first 10% of losses in exchange for an upside cap that resets every November.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

FNOV The Fund seeks returns matching the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, up to a predetermined cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses during the current November outcome period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • FNOV The deal is written down, not improvised: FLEX options on SPY, the first 10% of price losses absorbed, upside capped, everything reset on a known November date.sec.gov
  • Live since November 2019, through a bear market and multiple resets, and now a multi-billion-dollar member of First Trust's every-month buffer ladder.sec.gov
  • The options settle through the Options Clearing Corporation, so the buffer does not hang on a single bank's creditworthiness the way a structured note does.sec.gov
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • FNOV The 10% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and your own cushion and upside room differ from the headline terms.sec.gov
  • 0.85% a year, above the typical buffer fund. Similar 10% buffer exposure trades cheaper elsewhere, such as ZALT at 0.69% or the laddered BUFB at 0.10%.
  • It follows SPY's price return, so index dividends do not come through and the fund is not built as an income payer.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full FNOV profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

FNOV vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FNOV vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying FNOV vs ZALT

$2,770

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FNOV 0.85%

    $16,199

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FNOV 0.85%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FNOV $16,199ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearFNOVZALTOverpaying
10$1,508$1,232$276
20$5,706$4,697$1,009
30$16,199$13,429$2,770

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%FNOV
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

FNOV 60th cheapest of 77 funds

FNOV vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
FNOV None
ZALT None

Distribution history

FNOVAll FNOV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FNOV vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FNOV 7.9%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FNOV 1.44ZALT 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FNOV −15.9%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FNOV 0.67ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • FNOVCvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FNOVCvsTENJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FNOVCvsSIXJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.