ZALT ranks 1st and FOCT 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
FOCT vs ZALT
ZALT −0.16pt a year
0.85%0.69%
ZALT 4.2×the volume
33.1K138K
FOCT +4.3pt
+14.9%+10.6%
FOCT vs ZALT Performance
+11.9%+7.1%
- FOCT 0.85%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- FOCT $1.28B
- ZALT $840M
- FOCT +11.9%, better
- ZALT +7.1%
- FOCT 3
- ZALT 503
- FOCT 33.1K sh
- ZALT 138K sh, better
- FOCT $54.41
- ZALT $34.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FOCT | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | C47 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | A70Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | B57 | A90Higher |
| Durability | A82Higher | B61 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. FOCT and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FOCTC
ZALTA
In short
FOCT One of twelve month-dated buffer funds from First Trust, FOCT absorbs the first 10% of a year's decline in the SPDR S&P 500 fund it tracks, in exchange for an upside cap fixed each October. Index exposure with the sharp edges sanded down.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
FOCT The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, subject to a 15.09% upside cap, while protecting the first 10% of losses during the October 20, 2025–October 16, 2026 target-outcome period.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FOCT vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FOCT vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying FOCT vs ZALT
$2,770
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FOCT 0.85%
$16,199
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FOCT | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,232 | $276 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $4,697 | $1,009 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $13,429 | $2,770 |
- 0.85%FOCT
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
FOCT 60th cheapest of 77 funds
FOCT vs ZALT Dividends
- FOCT None
- ZALT None
Distribution history
FOCT vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FOCT 7.6%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FOCT 1.30ZALT 1.50, better
- Worst fall
- FOCT −14.1%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FOCT 0.64ZALT 0.29
FOCT and ZALT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
