Skip to content

FOCT vs ZALT

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October

FOCTCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.16pt a year

FOCT0.85%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 4.2×the volume

FOCT33.1KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

FOCT +4.3pt

FOCT+14.9%ZALT+10.6%

FOCT vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.9%FOCT+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FOCT +11.9%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FOCT 0.85%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
FOCT $1.28B
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
FOCT +11.9%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
FOCT 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
FOCT 33.1K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
FOCT $54.41
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FOCT: Cost 11, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 57, Durability 82. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for FOCT, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFOCTZALT
Cost30% weightF11A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC47A79Higher
Tradability15% weightA70HigherB65
Holdings10% weightB57A90Higher
Durability5% weightA82HigherB61

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FOCT and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and FOCT 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 57CAUGCCorgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40
  4. Rank 57CFOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - OctoberScore 40
  5. Rank 57CJULCCorgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FOCTCFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

FOCT One of twelve month-dated buffer funds from First Trust, FOCT absorbs the first 10% of a year's decline in the SPDR S&P 500 fund it tracks, in exchange for an upside cap fixed each October. Index exposure with the sharp edges sanded down.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

FOCT The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, subject to a 15.09% upside cap, while protecting the first 10% of losses during the October 20, 2025–October 16, 2026 target-outcome period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • FOCT The trade is spelled out up front: the first 10% of the reference fund's price decline absorbed over the year, upside capped at a level set on the October reset day.ftportfolios.com
  • Twelve siblings, one per calendar month (FSEP, FNOV and the rest), so the reset date is a choice rather than a constraint, and the terms reset on the same schedule every year.
  • Running since 2020 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, so this October dial has already rolled through a stack of full outcome periods.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • FOCT Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left that day, not the headline terms. The full deal belongs to whoever holds from one October reset to the next.ftportfolios.com
  • 0.85% a year sits on the higher side of its buffer-fund cohort, where the median is closer to 0.79%. Downside protection carries a sticker price.
  • The target is price return, so dividends from the underlying S&P 500 fund don't come along for the ride. This one has not been paying distributions.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full FOCT profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

FOCT vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FOCT vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying FOCT vs ZALT

$2,770

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FOCT 0.85%

    $16,199

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FOCT 0.85%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FOCT $16,199ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearFOCTZALTOverpaying
10$1,508$1,232$276
20$5,706$4,697$1,009
30$16,199$13,429$2,770

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%FOCT
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

FOCT 60th cheapest of 77 funds

FOCT vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
FOCT None
ZALT None

Distribution history

FOCTAll FOCT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FOCT vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FOCT 7.6%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FOCT 1.30ZALT 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FOCT −14.1%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FOCT 0.64ZALT 0.29

FOCT and ZALT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FOCTCvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FOCTCvsTENJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FOCTCvsSIXJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.