FREL ranks 3rd and ICF 9th of 21 funds in the US Real Estate Category.
FREL vs ICF
FREL −0.24pt a year
0.08%0.32%
FREL 1.4×the volume
313K226K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+6.6%+6.6%
FREL vs ICF Performance
+7.2%+10.6%
- FREL 0.08%, better
- ICF 0.32%
- FREL $1.4B
- ICF $2.03B
- FREL +11.7%
- ICF +15.3%, better
- FREL 3.29%, better
- ICF 2.54%
- FREL 126
- ICF 33
- FREL 313K sh, better
- ICF 226K sh
- FREL $29.53
- ICF $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FREL | ICF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | B57 |
| Mission | A99Higher | A98 |
| Risk | C53 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | B68 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | A76Higher | D25 |
| Durability | B66 | A74Higher |
Rank among US Real Estate funds
Same Category. FREL and ICF are both graded against the same 21 US Real Estate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FRELA
ICFB
In short
FREL Fidelity's take on US real estate: one index, about 150 property stocks, and a 0.08% fee against a 0.37% category median. Cheap beta on landlords, and one of the strongest implementations in its peer group.
ICF Since 2001 this fund has owned a short list of about 30 big U.S. landlords instead of the whole property sector. Cohen & Steers builds the index, iShares runs the wrapper, and concentration is the feature, not an accident.
Stated mandate
FREL The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index.
ICF The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. real estate investment trusts, offering diversified exposure to the U.S. real estate market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FREL vs ICF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FREL vs ICF Cost
Overpaying ICF vs FREL
$4,769
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FREL 0.084%
$1,773
ICF 0.32%
$6,542
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FREL | ICF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $580 | $426 |
| 20 | $603 | $2,250 | $1,647 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $6,542 | $4,769 |
- 0.08%FREL, cheaper
- 0.32%ICF
- Middle half of US Real Estate funds
- Median 0.35%
FREL 4th cheapest of 21 funds
ICF 10th cheapest of 21 funds
FREL vs ICF Dividends
- FREL 3.29%, better
- ICF 2.54%
- FREL $0.97
- ICF $1.74
- FREL $0.23
- ICF $0.48
- FREL Sep 18, 2026
- ICF Sep 15, 2026
- FREL Sep 22, 2026
- ICF Sep 18, 2026
- FREL Quarterly
- ICF Quarterly
Distribution history
FREL vs ICF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FREL
- ICF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FREL 16.5%ICF 16.5%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- FREL 0.56ICF 0.60, better
- Worst fall
- FREL −34.4%, betterICF −34.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FREL 0.97ICF 0.93
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.