FSEC ranks 3rd and TRBF 6th of 10 funds in the Core Securitized Bond Category.
FSEC vs TRBF
FSEC −0.08pt a year
0.36%0.44%
FSEC 57.4×the volume
408K7.12K
FSEC vs TRBF Performance
+0.7%0.0%
- FSEC 0.36%, better
- TRBF 0.44%
- FSEC $4.46B
- TRBF $50M
- FSEC +0.7%, better
- TRBF 0.0%
- FSEC 4.56%
- TRBF
- FSEC 1176
- TRBF 319
- FSEC 408K sh, better
- TRBF 7.12K sh
- FSEC $42.71
- TRBF $47.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FSEC | TRBF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59Higher | D35 |
| Mission | A94Higher | A90 |
| Risk | C42 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | B68Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | C44Higher | C43 |
| Durability | A79Higher | D35 |
Rank among Core Securitized Bond funds
Same Category. FSEC and TRBF are both graded against the same 10 Core Securitized Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FSECB
TRBFB
In short
FSEC Most funds in this aisle buy a little of everything. FSEC goes narrow: at least 80% in securitized debt, run for current income, paid out monthly.
TRBF Angel Oak built its name in mortgage credit, and TRBF is that playbook in an ETF: an actively managed bond fund that hunts relative value across securitized and corporate paper instead of tracking the Agg.
Stated mandate
FSEC The fund seeks a high level of current income by investing primarily in securitized securities and related instruments. Its policy requires at least 80% exposure to that securitized-investment segment.
TRBF The Fund seeks total return. It is actively managed and allocates among fixed-income asset classes according to the Adviser’s assessment of relative value rather than tracking a specified index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FSEC vs TRBF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FSEC vs TRBF Cost
Overpaying TRBF vs FSEC
$1,532
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FSEC 0.36%
$7,320
TRBF 0.44%
$8,852
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FSEC | TRBF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $652 | $794 | $142 |
| 20 | $2,522 | $3,061 | $539 |
| 30 | $7,320 | $8,852 | $1,532 |
- 0.36%FSEC, cheaper
- 0.44%TRBF
- Middle half of Core Securitized Bond funds
- Median 0.38%
FSEC 5th cheapest of 10 funds
TRBF 7th cheapest of 10 funds
FSEC vs TRBF Dividends
- FSEC 4.56%
- TRBF
- FSEC $1.95
- TRBF
- FSEC $0.14
- TRBF $0.22
- FSEC Oct 29, 2026
- TRBF Oct 30, 2026
- FSEC Pays Nov 2, 2026
- TRBF Pays Nov 2, 2026
- FSEC Monthly
- TRBF Monthly
Distribution history
FSEC vs TRBF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FSEC 6.3%TRBF 5.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FSEC 0.36TRBF −0.70
- Worst fall
- FSEC −17.4%TRBF −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FSEC 1.14TRBF 0.08
Popular comparisons
- 0.36% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.