GIGB ranks 4th and FSIG 32nd of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
FSIG vs GIGB
GIGB −0.36pt a year
0.44%0.08%
FSIG 5.1×the volume
424K83.7K
GIGB +1.1pt
+5.3%+6.4%
FSIG vs GIGB Performance
+1.4%−0.5%
- FSIG 0.44%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- FSIG $1.53B
- GIGB $1.04B
- FSIG +1.4%, better
- GIGB −0.5%
- FSIG 4.89%, better
- GIGB 4.77%
- FSIG 324
- GIGB 2719
- FSIG 424K sh, better
- GIGB 83.7K sh
- FSIG $18.55
- GIGB $44.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FSIG | GIGB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | A94Higher |
| Mission | B69 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A73Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | B61Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | A71 | A87Higher |
| Durability | B66 | A74Higher |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. FSIG and GIGB are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FSIGC
GIGBA
In short
FSIG First Trust's short-end corporate bond fund: roughly 300 investment-grade credits, monthly income, and a mandate built around current income rather than an index. The trade-off is a 0.44% fee in a pennies-a-year category.
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
Stated mandate
FSIG The Fund seeks current income by investing at least 80% of its net assets in investment-grade corporate debt securities under normal market conditions.
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FSIG vs GIGB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FSIG vs GIGB Cost
Overpaying FSIG vs GIGB
$7,163
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FSIG 0.44%
$8,852
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FSIG | GIGB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $794 | $147 | $647 |
| 20 | $3,061 | $575 | $2,486 |
| 30 | $8,852 | $1,689 | $7,163 |
- 0.44%FSIG
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
FSIG 42nd cheapest of 49 funds
FSIG vs GIGB Dividends
- FSIG 4.89%, better
- GIGB 4.77%
- FSIG $0.91
- GIGB $2.12
- FSIG $0.07
- GIGB $0.18
- FSIG Oct 21, 2026
- GIGB Oct 1, 2026
- FSIG Oct 30, 2026
- GIGB Oct 7, 2026
- FSIG Monthly
- GIGB Monthly
Distribution history
FSIG vs GIGB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FSIG 2.9%, betterGIGB 6.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- FSIG 0.27GIGB 0.30, better
- Worst fall
- FSIG −6.9%GIGB −21.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FSIG 0.45GIGB 1.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.44% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.