INCM ranks 1st and FTBI 11th of 15 funds in the Multi-Asset Income Category.
FTBI vs INCM
INCM −0.60pt a year
0.98%0.38%
INCM 55.3×the volume
7.55K418K
FTBI vs INCM Performance
+7.5%+11.3%
- FTBI 0.98%
- INCM 0.38%, better
- FTBI $30M
- INCM $2.03B
- FTBI +7.5%
- INCM +11.3%, better
- FTBI 7.92%, better
- INCM 5.67%
- FTBI 16
- INCM 393
- FTBI 7.55K sh
- INCM 418K sh, better
- FTBI $21.20
- INCM $29.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTBI | INCM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D36 | A93Higher |
| Mission | B68 | |
| Risk | D36 | A80Higher |
| Tradability | C41 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | B55 | |
| Durability | C45 | A77Higher |
Rank among Multi-Asset Income funds
Same Category. FTBI and INCM are both graded against the same 15 Multi-Asset Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTBIC
INCMA
In short
FTBI A one-ticker income recipe from a single kitchen: 60% option-income equity ETFs, 35% investment-grade bonds, 5% gold-linked income, all First Trust funds, reset semi-annually. Pays monthly, costs 0.98%.
INCM A go-anywhere income hunt in ETF form: Franklin's managers roam across asset classes chasing current income, hold roughly 400 positions, charge 0.38%, and pay out monthly.
Stated mandate
FTBI The Fund seeks to match the price and yield, before fees and expenses, of the Bloomberg Moderate Allocation Income Focus Index. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in the ETFs comprising that Index.
INCM The fund seeks a high level of current income, with long-term capital appreciation as a secondary objective.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTBI vs INCM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTBI vs INCM Cost
Overpaying FTBI vs INCM
$10,656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTBI 0.98%
$18,362
INCM 0.38%
$7,706
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTBI | INCM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,729 | $688 | $1,041 |
| 20 | $6,504 | $2,658 | $3,846 |
| 30 | $18,362 | $7,706 | $10,656 |
- 0.98%FTBI
- 0.38%INCM, cheaper
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Income funds
- Median 0.71%
INCM 2nd cheapest of 15 funds
FTBI 10th cheapest of 15 funds
FTBI vs INCM Dividends
- FTBI 7.92%, better
- INCM 5.67%
- FTBI $1.68
- INCM $1.66
- FTBI $0.13
- INCM $0.13
- FTBI Oct 21, 2026
- INCM Oct 30, 2026
- FTBI Oct 30, 2026
- INCM Pays Nov 4, 2026
- FTBI Monthly
- INCM Monthly
Distribution history
FTBI vs INCM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTBI 6.4%INCM 7.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTBI 1.24INCM 1.19
- Worst fall
- FTBI −5.3%INCM −7.8%
- Market sensitivity
- FTBI 0.47INCM 0.70
Popular comparisons
- 0.98% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.