GIGB ranks 4th and FTRB 35th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
FTRB vs GIGB
GIGB −0.31pt a year
0.39%0.08%
FTRB 2.7×the volume
226K83.7K
FTRB vs GIGB Performance
0.0%−0.5%
- FTRB 0.39%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- FTRB $724M
- GIGB $1.04B
- FTRB 0.0%, better
- GIGB −0.5%
- FTRB 4.77%
- GIGB 4.77%
- FTRB 695
- GIGB 2719
- FTRB 226K sh, better
- GIGB 83.7K sh
- FTRB $24.43
- GIGB $44.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTRB | GIGB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F20 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A93 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C43 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | B68Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | F19 | A87Higher |
| Durability | C52 | A74Higher |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. FTRB and GIGB are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTRBC
GIGBA
In short
FTRB An ETF wrapper on Federated Hermes' long-running multi-sector bond strategy: an investment-grade core measured against the Bloomberg US Aggregate, with license to roam into high yield and foreign debt. Active, not an index tracker.
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
Stated mandate
FTRB The Fund seeks total return by investing primarily in U.S.-dollar-denominated, investment-grade fixed-income securities.
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTRB vs GIGB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTRB vs GIGB Cost
Overpaying FTRB vs GIGB
$6,209
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTRB 0.39%
$7,898
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTRB | GIGB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $147 | $558 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $575 | $2,150 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $1,689 | $6,209 |
- 0.39%FTRB
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
FTRB 39th cheapest of 49 funds
FTRB vs GIGB Dividends
- FTRB 4.77%
- GIGB 4.77%
- FTRB $1.16
- GIGB $2.12
- FTRB $0.10
- GIGB $0.18
- FTRB Oct 30, 2026
- GIGB Oct 1, 2026
- FTRB Pays Nov 2, 2026
- GIGB Oct 7, 2026
- FTRB Monthly
- GIGB Monthly
Distribution history
FTRB vs GIGB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTRB 4.7%GIGB 6.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTRB −0.20GIGB 0.30
- Worst fall
- FTRB −4.8%GIGB −21.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FTRB 0.12GIGB 1.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.