Skip to content

FXR vs IYJ

First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund

FXRDNYSE Arca

iShares U.S. Industrials ETF

IYJCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

IYJ −0.23pt a year

FXR0.60%IYJ0.37%

Avg volume · 30D

IYJ 4.7×the volume

FXR27.4KIYJ130K

10Y return · a year

FXR +0.3pt

FXR+12.2%IYJ+11.9%

FXR vs IYJ Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+48.6%FXR+48.3%IYJ

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. FXR +48.6%. IYJ +48.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%60%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FXR 0.60%
IYJ 0.37%, better
Fund size
FXR $707M
IYJ $1.79B
1Y total return
FXR +17.0%, better
IYJ +11.2%
Yield (12M)
FXR 0.74%, better
IYJ 0.66%
Holdings
FXR 160
IYJ 217
Avg volume (30D)
FXR 27.4K sh
IYJ 130K sh, better
NAV per share
FXR $86.69
IYJ $155.44
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FXR: Cost 11, Risk 44, Mission 62, Tradability 26, Holdings 84, Durability 42. IYJ: Cost 41, Risk 62, Mission not scored, Tradability 68, Holdings 45, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for FXR, IYJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFXRIYJ
Cost30% weightF11C41Higher
Mission25% weightB62Not scored
Risk15% weightC44B62Higher
Tradability15% weightD26B68Higher
Holdings10% weightA84HigherC45
Durability5% weightC42B67Higher

Rank among Industrials (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FXR and IYJ are both graded against the same 10 Industrials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Industrials (Broad)⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

IYJ ranks 4th and FXR 9th of 10 funds in the Industrials (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLIState Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 2AFIDUFidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETFScore 69
  3. Rank 3BVISVanguard Industrials ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4CIYJiShares U.S. Industrials ETFScore 53
  5. Rank 5CEXIiShares Global Industrials ETFScore 52
  6. Rank 8CTRUIVanEck Industrials TruSector ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 9DFXRFirst Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX FundScore 32
  8. Rank 10FPRNInvesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETFScore 25

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FXRDFirst Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund

IYJCiShares U.S. Industrials ETF

In short

FXR Industrials, but not by size. FXR ranks US industrial names on growth and value metrics, drops the weakest, then weights the survivors in tiers. A 2007-vintage smart-beta spin on planes, trains and machinery.

IYJ Industrials with a wider net: roughly 200 construction, manufacturing and transport names drawn from the Russell 1000, not just the S&P 500 blue chips. An iShares original, trading since 2000.

Stated mandate

FXR The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield, before fees and expenses, of the StrataQuant® Industrials Index.

IYJ The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. industrial-sector equities, providing diversified access to companies involved in construction, manufacturing, and transportation.

Why people hold it

  • FXR The AlphaDEX screen scores industrials on growth and value metrics, cuts the lowest-ranked names, and weights what's left by rank rather than market cap.ftportfolios.comfirsttrust.ca
  • Roughly 140 holdings, sorted into tiers and equal-weighted inside each tier, so mid-cap machinery and transport names carry real weight instead of a handful of megacaps steering the fund.firsttrust.ca
  • Running since 2007, one of the original factor-screened sector funds, and it has stayed tight to its StrataQuant Industrials Index. Pays quarterly.
  • IYJ Casts a wider net than S&P 500 sector funds: roughly 200 holdings pulled from the Russell 1000 industrials, so mid-cap machinery, transport and services names make the cut.blackrock.comssga.com
  • The index is a capped build, trimming outsized single-stock weights at rebalance to stay inside fund diversification limits. One mega-cap industrial can't quietly take over.lseg.com
  • Listed since June 2000 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that pays quarterly. Long operating history through several industrial cycles, run by the biggest ETF shop around.

Worth knowing

  • FXR The screen costs money: 0.60% a year, against 0.08% for XLI and 0.09% for VIS. That gap is the price of the ranking rules.
  • Thinly traded next to the sector's household-name ETFs, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads, especially around the open and close.
  • Tiered weighting tilts the portfolio smaller than the cap-weighted sector, so results and volatility can diverge from the industrials index most people quote.firsttrust.ca
  • IYJ Breadth costs: 0.37% sits near the industrials category median, but plain-vanilla rivals XLI (0.08%), FIDU (0.084%) and VIS (0.09%) charge a fraction of it.
  • Still market-cap weighted under the caps, so the largest industrials set the tone while the long tail of mid caps carries small weights.blackrock.com
  • One sector, one cycle: construction, manufacturing and transportation earnings swing with the economy, so this moves on industrial news, not the whole market's.

Full FXR profile⁠

Full IYJ profile⁠

FXR vs IYJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FXR vs IYJ Cost

Overpaying FXR vs IYJ

$4,304

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FXR 0.60%

    $11,817

  • IYJ 0.37%

    $7,513

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FXR 0.60%
  • IYJ 0.37%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530FXR $11,817IYJ $7,513

Year by year

YearFXRIYJOverpaying
10$1,076$670$406
20$4,116$2,590$1,526
30$11,817$7,513$4,304

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%FXR
  • 0.37%IYJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of Industrials (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.33%

IYJ 6th cheapest of 10 funds

FXR 9th cheapest of 10 funds

FXR vs IYJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
FXR 0.74%, better
IYJ 0.66%
Payout (12M)
FXR $0.66
IYJ $1.06
Last payment
FXR $0.25
IYJ $0.30
Ex-dividend
FXR Sep 24, 2026
IYJ Sep 15, 2026
Paid on
FXR Sep 30, 2026
IYJ Sep 18, 2026
Frequency
FXR Quarterly
IYJ Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FXRQuarterly · 37 paymentsAll FXR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 37 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 23, 2017 $0.04; Jun 22, 2017 $0.05; Sep 21, 2017 $0.06; Dec 21, 2017 $0.07; Mar 22, 2018 $0.06; Jun 21, 2018 $0.09; Sep 14, 2018 $0.06; Dec 18, 2018 $0.19; Sep 25, 2019 $0.22; Dec 13, 2019 $0.11; Mar 26, 2020 $0.21; Jun 25, 2020 $0.11; Sep 24, 2020 $0.08; Dec 24, 2020 $0.14; Mar 25, 2021 $0.06; Jun 24, 2021 $0.09; Sep 23, 2021 $0.07; Dec 23, 2021 $0.10; Mar 25, 2022 $0.10; Jun 24, 2022 $0.11; Sep 23, 2022 $0.12; Dec 23, 2022 $0.14; Mar 24, 2023 $0.10; Jun 27, 2023 $0.10; Sep 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 22, 2023 $0.19; Mar 21, 2024 $0.07; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Sep 26, 2024 $0.13; Dec 13, 2024 $0.17; Mar 27, 2025 $0.11; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.16; Dec 12, 2025 $0.17; Mar 26, 2026 $0.08; Jun 25, 2026 $0.16; Sep 24, 2026 $0.25. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
IYJQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll IYJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.25; Jun 27, 2017 $0.25; Sep 26, 2017 $0.25; Dec 19, 2017 $0.20; Mar 22, 2018 $0.22; Jun 26, 2018 $0.24; Sep 26, 2018 $0.23; Dec 17, 2018 $0.23; Mar 20, 2019 $0.32; Jun 17, 2019 $0.24; Sep 24, 2019 $0.25; Dec 16, 2019 $0.30; Mar 25, 2020 $0.27; Jun 15, 2020 $0.22; Sep 23, 2020 $0.22; Dec 14, 2020 $0.27; Mar 25, 2021 $0.19; Jun 10, 2021 $0.21; Sep 24, 2021 $0.25; Dec 13, 2021 $0.21; Mar 24, 2022 $0.26; Jun 9, 2022 $0.22; Sep 26, 2022 $0.29; Dec 13, 2022 $0.25; Mar 23, 2023 $0.27; Jun 7, 2023 $0.27; Sep 26, 2023 $0.29; Dec 20, 2023 $0.36; Mar 21, 2024 $0.24; Jun 11, 2024 $0.26; Sep 25, 2024 $0.30; Dec 17, 2024 $0.37; Mar 18, 2025 $0.28; Jun 16, 2025 $0.26; Sep 16, 2025 $0.42; Dec 16, 2025 $0.27; Mar 17, 2026 $0.27; Jun 15, 2026 $0.21; Sep 15, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

FXR vs IYJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FXR
  • IYJ
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: FXR −26.9% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FXR 18.8%IYJ 15.3%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FXR 0.74IYJ 0.92, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FXR −26.9%IYJ −26.0%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FXR 1.08IYJ 1.01

Popular comparisons

  • FXRDvsXLIA

    First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund · State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IYJCvsXLIA

    iShares U.S. Industrials ETF · State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FXRDvsFIDUA

    First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund · Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IYJCvsFIDUA

    iShares U.S. Industrials ETF · Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FXRDvsVISB

    First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund · Vanguard Industrials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IYJCvsVISB

    iShares U.S. Industrials ETF · Vanguard Industrials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.