USCA ranks 2nd and GARP 11th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
GARP vs USCA
USCA −0.08pt a year
0.15%0.07%
GARP 4.1×the volume
402K97.9K
GARP +8.0pt
+28.5%+20.5%
GARP vs USCA Performance
+11.7%+7.7%
- GARP 0.15%
- USCA 0.07%, better
- GARP $3.45B
- USCA $3.42B
- GARP +11.7%, better
- USCA +7.7%
- GARP 0.27%
- USCA 1.05%, better
- GARP 132
- USCA 392
- GARP 402K sh, better
- USCA 97.9K sh
- GARP $77.61
- USCA $44.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GARP | USCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A73 | A91Higher |
| Risk | D36 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | A73Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | D28 | D29Higher |
| Durability | B58Higher | C49 |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. GARP and USCA are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GARPB
USCAA
In short
GARP Growth at a reasonable price is usually a stock-picker's discipline. GARP hard-codes it: US large and mid caps screened for growth, then filtered for value and quality, roughly 130 names, at a fee under the factor-fund norm.
USCA The largest US ETF debut on record when it launched in 2023, seeded by a Finnish pension fund. It owns roughly 400 US large- and mid-caps, keeping only the top half of each sector on MSCI's climate-transition scoring, for 0.07% a year.
Stated mandate
GARP The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. growth stocks that exhibit favorable value and quality characteristics.
USCA The fund seeks to track the MSCI USA Climate Action Index before fees and expenses through a passive indexing strategy. The index selects U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies assessed as leading sector peers in climate-transition positioning and actions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GARP vs USCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GARP vs USCA Cost
Overpaying GARP vs USCA
$1,657
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GARP 0.15%
$3,137
USCA 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GARP | USCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $128 | $146 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $503 | $568 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $1,480 | $1,657 |
- 0.15%GARP
- 0.07%USCA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
USCA 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
GARP 5th cheapest of 30 funds
GARP vs USCA Dividends
- GARP 0.27%
- USCA 1.05%, better
- GARP $0.21
- USCA $0.47
- GARP $0.05
- USCA $0.10
- GARP Sep 15, 2026
- USCA Sep 18, 2026
- GARP Sep 18, 2026
- USCA Sep 25, 2026
- GARP Quarterly
- USCA Quarterly
Distribution history
GARP vs USCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GARP 19.0%USCA 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GARP 1.27USCA 1.27Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- GARP −30.6%USCA −19.2%
- Market sensitivity
- GARP 1.18USCA 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.