XHLF ranks 5th and GBIL 10th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
GBIL vs XHLF
XHLF −0.09pt a year
0.12%0.03%
GBIL 2.1×the volume
653K309K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+4.4%+4.4%
GBIL vs XHLF Performance
+3.6%+3.6%
- GBIL 0.12%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- GBIL $7.9B
- XHLF $2.03B
- GBIL +3.6%
- XHLF +3.6%
- GBIL 3.92%
- XHLF 4.08%, better
- GBIL 41
- XHLF 29
- GBIL 653K sh, better
- XHLF 309K sh
- GBIL $100.19
- XHLF $50.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GBIL | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C40 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | A83Higher | A78 |
| Holdings | B56Higher | D35 |
| Durability | A87Higher | B59 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. GBIL and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GBILA
XHLFA
In short
GBIL Treasuries only, and the whole under-one-year slice: bills plus old notes and bonds in their final 12 months. Goldman's 2016-vintage cash park charges 0.12% net of a waiver through December 29, 2026.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
GBIL The Fund seeks to track the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index, which measures U.S. Treasury securities with no more than 12 months remaining maturity. It is passively managed and generally sells securities only when the index removes them.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GBIL vs XHLF Holdings
How GBIL and XHLF differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
Sector
No Sector split for GBIL and XHLF.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in GBILMore in XHLF | GBIL | XHLF |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- GBIL45.2%
- XHLF79.1%
- GBIL41
- XHLF29
Asset class
- GBIL
- Fixed Income
- XHLF
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. GBIL holds 41 securities, XHLF 29.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GBIL vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying GBIL vs XHLF
$1,882
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GBIL 0.12%
$2,520
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GBIL | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $55 | $165 |
| 20 | $859 | $216 | $643 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $638 | $1,882 |
- 0.12%GBIL
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
GBIL 15th cheapest of 78 funds
GBIL vs XHLF Dividends
- GBIL 3.92%
- XHLF 4.08%, better
- GBIL $3.92
- XHLF $2.05
- GBIL $0.32
- XHLF $0.16
- GBIL Nov 2, 2026
- XHLF Nov 2, 2026
- GBIL Pays Nov 6, 2026
- XHLF Pays Nov 5, 2026
- GBIL Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
GBIL vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GBIL 0.7%XHLF 0.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GBIL −0.17, betterXHLF −0.52
- Worst fall
- GBIL −0.8%XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- GBIL 0.01XHLF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.