SLJY ranks 3rd and GDXY 6th of 12 funds in the Gold & Metals Option Income Category.
GDXY vs SLJY
SLJY −0.24pt a year
1.00%0.76%
GDXY 19.2×the volume
702K36.6K
GDXY vs SLJY Performance
−2.7%+6.0%
- GDXY 1.00%
- SLJY 0.76%, better
- GDXY $256M
- SLJY $63M
- GDXY −2.7%
- SLJY +6.0%, better
- GDXY 81.64%, better
- SLJY 30.68%
- GDXY 10
- SLJY 54
- GDXY 702K sh, better
- SLJY 36.6K sh
- GDXY $8.68
- SLJY $22.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GDXY | SLJY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A87Higher |
| Mission | D37 | A70Higher |
| Risk | C47Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | B59Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | A80 | |
| Durability | A72Higher | C51 |
Rank among Gold & Metals Option Income funds
Same Category. GDXY and SLJY are both graded against the same 12 Gold & Metals Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GDXYC
SLJYB
In short
GDXY Most gold-income funds write options on bullion. GDXY writes call spreads on the miners instead, collecting premium while leaving room to participate when the shares run past the spread. The option-income playbook, pointed at gold's equity cousin.
SLJY Junior silver miners swing hard. SLJY sells that volatility: an out-of-the-money covered-call overlay on a junior silver miner basket, targeting 18% annualized option premium and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
GDXY GDXY seeks weekly income by selling call spreads on the VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX), while retaining participation in GDX share-price appreciation.
SLJY The fund seeks to balance high income and capital appreciation through exposure to junior silver mining companies and a covered-call strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GDXY vs SLJY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GDXY vs SLJY Cost
Overpaying GDXY vs SLJY
$4,032
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GDXY 1.00%
$18,688
SLJY 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GDXY | SLJY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,353 | $410 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $5,142 | $1,483 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $14,656 | $4,032 |
- 1.00%GDXY
- 0.76%SLJY, cheaper
- Middle half of Gold & Metals Option Income funds
- Median 0.95%
SLJY 2nd cheapest of 12 funds
GDXY 9th cheapest of 12 funds
GDXY vs SLJY Dividends
- GDXY 81.64%, better
- SLJY 30.68%
- GDXY $7.22
- SLJY $7.16
- GDXY $0.07
- SLJY $0.46
- GDXY Oct 29, 2026
- SLJY Oct 29, 2026
- GDXY Oct 30, 2026
- SLJY Oct 30, 2026
- GDXY Weekly
- SLJY Monthly
Distribution history
GDXY vs SLJY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GDXY 34.0%SLJY 48.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- GDXY 0.50SLJY 0.32
- Worst fall
- GDXY −36.9%SLJY −37.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GDXY 0.08SLJY 0.71
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.