GIGB ranks 4th and GIGL 27th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
GIGB vs GIGL
GIGB −0.21pt a year
0.08%0.29%
GIGB 1.9×the volume
83.7K43.4K
GIGB vs GIGL Performance
−0.5%−0.6%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- GIGL 0.29%
- GIGB $1.04B
- GIGL $246M
- GIGB −0.5%, better
- GIGL −0.6%
- GIGB 4.77%, better
- GIGL 4.29%
- GIGB 2719
- GIGL 470
- GIGB 83.7K sh, better
- GIGL 43.4K sh
- GIGB $44.25
- GIGL $48.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GIGB | GIGL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | C45 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54 | C54 |
| Tradability | C45 | C49Higher |
| Holdings | A87Higher | F4 |
| Durability | A74Higher | C48 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. GIGB and GIGL are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIGBA
GIGLB
In short
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
GIGL Goldman's credit desk in ETF form: an actively run corporate bond fund in an aisle ruled by index trackers, with permission to roam into high yield and foreign paper when the benchmark looks dull.
Stated mandate
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
GIGL The Fund seeks a high level of total return through capital appreciation and income. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets plus investment borrowings in corporate bonds and may also use other fixed-income securities and derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GIGB vs GIGL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GIGB vs GIGL Cost
Overpaying GIGL vs GIGB
$4,263
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
GIGL 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GIGB | GIGL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $527 | $380 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,044 | $1,469 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $5,952 | $4,263 |
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- 0.29%GIGL
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
GIGL 26th cheapest of 49 funds
GIGB vs GIGL Dividends
- GIGB 4.77%, better
- GIGL 4.29%
- GIGB $2.12
- GIGL $2.09
- GIGB $0.18
- GIGL $0.20
- GIGB Oct 1, 2026
- GIGL Oct 1, 2026
- GIGB Oct 7, 2026
- GIGL Oct 7, 2026
- GIGB Monthly
- GIGL Monthly
Distribution history
GIGB vs GIGL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GIGB 6.5%GIGL 4.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- GIGB 0.30GIGL −0.44
- Worst fall
- GIGB −21.9%GIGL −4.7%
- Market sensitivity
- GIGB 1.04GIGL 0.16
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.