GIGB ranks 5th and GXIG 26th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
GIGB vs GXIG
GIGB −0.07pt a year
0.08%0.15%
GIGB 11.4×the volume
83.7K7.36K
GIGB vs GXIG Performance
−0.7%−1.0%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- GXIG 0.15%
- GIGB $1.04B
- GXIG $167M
- GIGB −0.7%, better
- GXIG −1.0%
- GIGB 5.20%
- GXIG 6.98%, better
- GIGB 2777
- GXIG 108
- GIGB 83.7K sh, better
- GXIG 7.36K sh
- GIGB $44.34
- GXIG $24.03
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GIGB | GXIG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A75 |
| Risk | C53Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | C45Higher | F24 |
| Holdings | A88Higher | C40 |
| Durability | A74Higher | C46 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. GIGB and GXIG are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIGBA
GXIGB
In short
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
GXIG An active corporate bond fund that runs a quant multifactor model and a deep neural network across the US investment grade market, then holds a concentrated slate of about 100 bonds instead of shadowing a thousand-name index.
Stated mandate
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
GXIG The Fund seeks total return through both income and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GIGB vs GXIG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GIGB vs GXIG Cost
Overpaying GXIG vs GIGB
$1,448
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
GXIG 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GIGB | GXIG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $274 | $127 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,071 | $496 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $3,137 | $1,448 |
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- 0.15%GXIG
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
GXIG 10th cheapest of 49 funds
GIGB vs GXIG Dividends
- GIGB 5.20%
- GXIG 6.98%, better
- GIGB $2.29
- GXIG $1.67
- GIGB $0.18
- GXIG $0.11
- GIGB Nov 2, 2026
- GXIG Nov 2, 2026
- GIGB Pays Nov 6, 2026
- GXIG Pays Nov 5, 2026
- GIGB Monthly
- GXIG Monthly
Distribution history
GIGB vs GXIG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GIGB 6.5%GXIG 4.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- GIGB 0.30GXIG −0.52
- Worst fall
- GIGB −21.9%GXIG −5.4%
- Market sensitivity
- GIGB 1.04GXIG 0.14
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.