GIGB ranks 4th and IBD 42nd of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
GIGB vs IBD
GIGB −0.33pt a year
0.08%0.41%
IBD 1.2×the volume
83.7K97.7K
IBD +1.5pt
−0.2%+1.3%
GIGB vs IBD Performance
−0.8%+6.4%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- IBD 0.41%
- GIGB $1.04B
- IBD $483M
- GIGB −0.5%
- IBD +1.1%, better
- GIGB 4.77%, better
- IBD 4.41%
- GIGB 2719
- IBD 252
- GIGB 83.7K sh
- IBD 97.7K sh, better
- GIGB $44.25
- IBD $23.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GIGB | IBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | F17 |
| Mission | A100Higher | C49 |
| Risk | C54 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | C45Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | D35 |
| Durability | A74Higher | C48 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. GIGB and IBD are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIGBA
IBDD
In short
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
IBD The first bond ETF ever built on biblical-values screens. IBD holds intermediate-term investment grade US corporate debt from companies that clear Inspire's rules-based Impact Score, and pays monthly.
Stated mandate
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
IBD The fund seeks to track the Inspire Corporate Bond Impact Index before fees and expenses. It generally invests at least 80% of assets in the index's component securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GIGB vs IBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GIGB vs IBD Cost
Overpaying IBD vs GIGB
$6,592
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
IBD 0.41%
$8,281
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GIGB | IBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $741 | $594 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,860 | $2,285 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $8,281 | $6,592 |
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- 0.41%IBD
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
IBD 41st cheapest of 49 funds
GIGB vs IBD Dividends
- GIGB 4.77%, better
- IBD 4.41%
- GIGB $2.12
- IBD $1.03
- GIGB $0.18
- IBD $0.10
- GIGB Oct 1, 2026
- IBD Oct 28, 2026
- GIGB Oct 7, 2026
- IBD Pays Nov 2, 2026
- GIGB Monthly
- IBD Monthly
Distribution history
GIGB vs IBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GIGB
- IBD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GIGB 6.5%IBD 4.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GIGB 0.30, betterIBD 0.28
- Worst fall
- GIGB −21.9%IBD −13.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GIGB 1.04IBD 0.66
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.