GIGB ranks 4th and IIGD 12th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
GIGB vs IIGD
GIGB −0.05pt a year
0.08%0.13%
GIGB 13.7×the volume
83.7K6.12K
IIGD +1.9pt
−0.2%+1.7%
GIGB vs IIGD Performance
−0.8%+9.0%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- IIGD 0.13%
- GIGB $1.04B
- IIGD $24M
- GIGB −0.5%
- IIGD +1.0%, better
- GIGB 4.77%, better
- IIGD 4.32%
- GIGB 2719
- IIGD 166
- GIGB 83.7K sh, better
- IIGD 6.12K sh
- GIGB $44.25
- IIGD $24.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GIGB | IIGD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | A85 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A77 |
| Risk | C54 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | C48Higher |
| Holdings | A87Higher | A77 |
| Durability | A74Higher | D37 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. GIGB and IIGD are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIGBA
IIGDA
In short
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
IIGD Most investment-grade corporate funds just buy the whole market. IIGD screens it first: higher-quality issuers, shorter maturities, roughly 160 bonds, 0.13% a year. A defensive tilt inside the calmer corner of credit.
Stated mandate
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
IIGD The Fund seeks exposure to U.S. investment-grade bonds with relatively higher credit quality and shorter maturities, using representative sampling of its underlying index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GIGB vs IIGD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GIGB vs IIGD Cost
Overpaying IIGD vs GIGB
$1,037
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
IIGD 0.13%
$2,726
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GIGB | IIGD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $238 | $91 |
| 20 | $575 | $930 | $355 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $2,726 | $1,037 |
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- 0.13%IIGD
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
IIGD 7th cheapest of 49 funds
GIGB vs IIGD Dividends
- GIGB 4.77%, better
- IIGD 4.32%
- GIGB $2.12
- IIGD $1.04
- GIGB $0.18
- IIGD $0.09
- GIGB Oct 1, 2026
- IIGD Oct 19, 2026
- GIGB Oct 7, 2026
- IIGD Oct 23, 2026
- GIGB Monthly
- IIGD Monthly
Distribution history
GIGB vs IIGD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GIGB
- IIGD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GIGB 6.5%IIGD 3.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GIGB 0.30, betterIIGD 0.28
- Worst fall
- GIGB −21.9%IIGD −10.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GIGB 1.04IIGD 0.53
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.