GIGB ranks 4th and JHCB 27th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
GIGB vs JHCB
GIGB −0.21pt a year
0.08%0.29%
GIGB 2.9×the volume
83.7K29K
JHCB +0.2pt
−0.2%0.0%
GIGB vs JHCB Performance
−0.8%−0.2%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- JHCB 0.29%
- GIGB $1.04B
- JHCB $101M
- GIGB −0.5%, better
- JHCB −1.6%
- GIGB 4.77%
- JHCB 5.28%, better
- GIGB 2719
- JHCB 192
- GIGB 83.7K sh, better
- JHCB 29K sh
- GIGB $44.25
- JHCB $20.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GIGB | JHCB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | C45 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | C45Higher | D26 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | C53 |
| Durability | A74Higher | D35 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. GIGB and JHCB are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIGBA
JHCBB
In short
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
JHCB An active corner of a category built on index trackers: John Hancock's first bond ETF, run by Manulife's corporate credit team, holding a compact portfolio of roughly 190 investment-grade bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
JHCB The fund's stated strategy is to invest primarily in investment-grade bonds, with at least 80% of net assets plus investment borrowings invested in them under normal market conditions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GIGB vs JHCB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GIGB vs JHCB Cost
Overpaying JHCB vs GIGB
$4,263
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
JHCB 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GIGB | JHCB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $527 | $380 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,044 | $1,469 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $5,952 | $4,263 |
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- 0.29%JHCB
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
JHCB 26th cheapest of 49 funds
GIGB vs JHCB Dividends
- GIGB 4.77%
- JHCB 5.28%, better
- GIGB $2.12
- JHCB $1.07
- GIGB $0.18
- JHCB $0.09
- GIGB Oct 1, 2026
- JHCB Oct 28, 2026
- GIGB Oct 7, 2026
- JHCB Oct 30, 2026
- GIGB Monthly
- JHCB Monthly
Distribution history
GIGB vs JHCB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GIGB
- JHCB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GIGB 6.5%JHCB 6.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GIGB 0.30JHCB 0.33, better
- Worst fall
- GIGB −21.9%, betterJHCB −22.1%
- Market sensitivity
- GIGB 1.04JHCB 1.13
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.