GIGB ranks 4th and LQDB 10th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
GIGB vs LQDB
GIGB −0.07pt a year
0.08%0.15%
GIGB 29.5×the volume
83.7K2.84K
LQDB +0.4pt
−0.2%+0.2%
GIGB vs LQDB Performance
−0.8%+0.9%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- LQDB 0.15%
- GIGB $1.04B
- LQDB $58M
- GIGB −0.5%
- LQDB −0.2%, better
- GIGB 4.77%
- LQDB 4.91%, better
- GIGB 2719
- LQDB 1882
- GIGB 83.7K sh, better
- LQDB 2.84K sh
- GIGB $44.25
- LQDB $83.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GIGB | LQDB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | C50Higher |
| Holdings | A87Higher | A81 |
| Durability | A74Higher | C45 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. GIGB and LQDB are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIGBA
LQDBA
In short
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
LQDB Most investment-grade bond funds blend AAA through BBB. LQDB keeps only the BBB rung, the biggest and lowest-rated slice of the IG market, in one index fund of roughly 1,700 bonds that pays monthly.
Stated mandate
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
LQDB The fund seeks to track an index containing U.S. dollar-denominated corporate bonds rated BBB.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GIGB vs LQDB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GIGB vs LQDB Cost
Overpaying LQDB vs GIGB
$1,448
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
LQDB 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GIGB | LQDB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $274 | $127 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,071 | $496 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $3,137 | $1,448 |
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- 0.15%LQDB
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
LQDB 10th cheapest of 49 funds
GIGB vs LQDB Dividends
- GIGB 4.77%
- LQDB 4.91%, better
- GIGB $2.12
- LQDB $4.10
- GIGB $0.18
- LQDB $0.36
- GIGB Oct 1, 2026
- LQDB Oct 1, 2026
- GIGB Oct 7, 2026
- LQDB Oct 6, 2026
- GIGB Monthly
- LQDB Monthly
Distribution history
GIGB vs LQDB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GIGB
- LQDB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GIGB 6.5%LQDB 6.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GIGB 0.30LQDB 0.33, better
- Worst fall
- GIGB −21.9%LQDB −21.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GIGB 1.04LQDB 1.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.