GIGB ranks 4th and NCPB 29th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
GIGB vs NCPB
GIGB −0.23pt a year
0.08%0.31%
GIGB 9.2×the volume
83.7K9.07K
GIGB vs NCPB Performance
−0.5%+0.2%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- NCPB 0.31%
- GIGB $1.04B
- NCPB $56M
- GIGB −0.5%
- NCPB +0.2%, better
- GIGB 4.77%
- NCPB 5.30%, better
- GIGB 2719
- NCPB 576
- GIGB 83.7K sh, better
- NCPB 9.07K sh
- GIGB $44.25
- NCPB $24.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GIGB | NCPB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | D35 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | C45Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | D37 |
| Durability | A74Higher | D39 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. GIGB and NCPB are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIGBA
NCPBC
In short
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
NCPB Nuveen's active take on the core bond sleeve: mostly investment-grade, with a license to reach into high yield for extra spread, at a price tag under the typical fund in its category.
Stated mandate
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
NCPB The fund is actively managed and invests primarily across a broad range of investment-grade bonds and other fixed-income securities, with flexibility to invest in high-yield bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GIGB vs NCPB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GIGB vs NCPB Cost
Overpaying NCPB vs GIGB
$4,657
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
NCPB 0.31%
$6,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GIGB | NCPB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $563 | $416 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,182 | $1,607 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $6,346 | $4,657 |
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- 0.31%NCPB
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
NCPB 32nd cheapest of 49 funds
GIGB vs NCPB Dividends
- GIGB 4.77%
- NCPB 5.30%, better
- GIGB $2.12
- NCPB $1.28
- GIGB $0.18
- NCPB $0.10
- GIGB Oct 1, 2026
- NCPB Oct 1, 2026
- GIGB Oct 7, 2026
- NCPB Oct 2, 2026
- GIGB Monthly
- NCPB Monthly
Distribution history
GIGB vs NCPB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GIGB 6.5%NCPB 4.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- GIGB 0.30NCPB −0.11
- Worst fall
- GIGB −21.9%NCPB −4.4%
- Market sensitivity
- GIGB 1.04NCPB 0.18
GIGB and NCPB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.31% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.31% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.31% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
