GIGB ranks 4th and QIG 16th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
GIGB vs QIG
GIGB −0.10pt a year
0.08%0.18%
GIGB 73.4×the volume
83.7K1.14K
GIGB +0.1pt
−0.2%−0.3%
GIGB vs QIG Performance
−0.8%−1.4%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- QIG 0.18%
- GIGB $1.04B
- QIG $17M
- GIGB −0.5%, better
- QIG −0.9%
- GIGB 4.77%
- QIG 5.14%, better
- GIGB 2719
- QIG 511
- GIGB 83.7K sh, better
- QIG 1.14K sh
- GIGB $44.25
- QIG $42.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GIGB | QIG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | A70 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | C45Higher | D25 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | B60 |
| Durability | A74Higher | C50 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. GIGB and QIG are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIGBA
QIGB
In short
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
QIG Most investment-grade corporate bond ETFs just buy the market. QIG screens U.S. investment-grade issuers on fundamental and income characteristics first, then pays out monthly.
Stated mandate
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
QIG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Corporate Bond Index. The index selects U.S. investment-grade corporate issuers based on favorable fundamental and income characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GIGB vs QIG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GIGB vs QIG Cost
Overpaying QIG vs GIGB
$2,060
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
QIG 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GIGB | QIG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $328 | $181 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,281 | $706 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $3,749 | $2,060 |
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- 0.18%QIG
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
QIG 14th cheapest of 49 funds
GIGB vs QIG Dividends
- GIGB 4.77%
- QIG 5.14%, better
- GIGB $2.12
- QIG $2.19
- GIGB $0.18
- QIG $0.20
- GIGB Oct 1, 2026
- QIG Oct 27, 2026
- GIGB Oct 7, 2026
- QIG Oct 29, 2026
- GIGB Monthly
- QIG Monthly
Distribution history
GIGB vs QIG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GIGB
- QIG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GIGB 6.5%QIG 6.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GIGB 0.30, betterQIG 0.29
- Worst fall
- GIGB −21.9%, betterQIG −22.4%
- Market sensitivity
- GIGB 1.04QIG 1.06
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.