GIGB ranks 4th and SKOR 6th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
GIGB vs SKOR
GIGB −0.07pt a year
0.08%0.15%
SKOR 1.8×the volume
83.7K150K
SKOR +1.9pt
−0.2%+1.7%
GIGB vs SKOR Performance
−0.8%+8.9%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- SKOR 0.15%
- GIGB $1.04B
- SKOR $1.06B
- GIGB −0.5%
- SKOR +0.7%, better
- GIGB 4.77%, better
- SKOR 4.73%
- GIGB 2719
- SKOR 1344
- GIGB 83.7K sh
- SKOR 150K sh, better
- GIGB $44.25
- SKOR $47.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GIGB | SKOR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A93 |
| Risk | C54 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | A87Higher | A79 |
| Durability | A74 | A76Higher |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. GIGB and SKOR are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIGBA
SKORA
In short
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
SKOR Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the market. SKOR scores every eligible bond on issuer quality and relative value, then weights toward the winners, and stays in the one-to-under-10-year maturity lane.
Stated mandate
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
SKOR The Fund seeks to provide pre-fee investment results generally corresponding to the price and yield performance of the Northern Trust US Corporate Bond Quality Value Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GIGB vs SKOR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GIGB vs SKOR Cost
Overpaying SKOR vs GIGB
$1,448
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
SKOR 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GIGB | SKOR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $274 | $127 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,071 | $496 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $3,137 | $1,448 |
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- 0.15%SKOR
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
SKOR 10th cheapest of 49 funds
GIGB vs SKOR Dividends
- GIGB 4.77%, better
- SKOR 4.73%
- GIGB $2.12
- SKOR $2.24
- GIGB $0.18
- SKOR $0.16
- GIGB Oct 1, 2026
- SKOR Oct 1, 2026
- GIGB Oct 7, 2026
- SKOR Oct 7, 2026
- GIGB Monthly
- SKOR Monthly
Distribution history
GIGB vs SKOR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GIGB
- SKOR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GIGB 6.5%SKOR 4.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GIGB 0.30SKOR 0.44, better
- Worst fall
- GIGB −21.9%SKOR −14.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GIGB 1.04SKOR 0.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.