Skip to content
etf.net

GINC vs XAGG

Goldman Sachs ETF Trust

GINCANYSE Arca

Eaton Vance Strategic Income Opportunities ETF

XAGGANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GINC −0.10pt a year

GINC0.40%XAGG0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

XAGG 8.2×the volume

GINC53KXAGG433K

GINC vs XAGG Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.0%GINC+1.2%XAGG

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. GINC +1.0%. XAGG +1.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%0.25%0.5%0.75%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
GINC 0.40%, better
XAGG 0.50%
Fund size
GINC $212M
XAGG $2.21B
Holdings
GINC 491
XAGG 1063
Avg volume (30D)
GINC 53K sh
XAGG 433K sh, better
NAV per share
GINC $48.88
XAGG $48.40
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GINC: Cost 81, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 78, Durability 81. XAGG: Cost 67, Risk 72, Mission 78, Tradability 69, Holdings 65, Durability 91.
Pillar letters and Scores for GINC, XAGG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGINCXAGG
Cost30% weightA81HigherB67
Mission25% weightNot scoredA78
Risk15% weightC47A72Higher
Tradability15% weightA72HigherB69
Holdings10% weightA78HigherB65
Durability5% weightA81A91Higher

Rank among Multi-Sector Bond Income funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GINC and XAGG are both graded against the same 23 Multi-Sector Bond Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Multi-Sector Bond Income⁠

Category · 23 funds
See all 23 ›

GINC ranks 2nd and XAGG 4th of 23 funds in the Multi-Sector Bond Income Category.

  1. Rank 1AVGMSVanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2AAINPAllspring Income Plus ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 2AGINCGoldman Sachs ETF TrustScore 72
  4. Rank 4AXAGGEaton Vance Strategic Income Opportunities ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 5BTMBThornburg Multi Sector Bond ETFScore 70

GINC vs XAGG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GINC vs XAGG Cost

Overpaying XAGG vs GINC

$1,889

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GINC 0.40%

    $8,090

  • XAGG 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GINC 0.40%
  • XAGG 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530XAGG $9,979GINC $8,090

Year by year

YearGINCXAGGOverpaying
10$723$900$177
20$2,793$3,460$667
30$8,090$9,979$1,889

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%GINC, cheaper
  • 0.50%XAGG
  • Middle half of Multi-Sector Bond Income funds
  • Median 0.60%

GINC 5th cheapest of 23 funds

XAGG 9th cheapest of 23 funds

GINC vs XAGG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Last payment
GINC $0.18
XAGG $0.27
Ex-dividend
GINC Oct 1, 2026
XAGG Oct 30, 2026
Paid on
GINC Oct 7, 2026
XAGG Pays Nov 5, 2026
Frequency
GINC Monthly
XAGG Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GINCMonthly · 2 paymentsAll GINC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Sep 1, 2026 $0.29; Oct 1, 2026 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
XAGGMonthly · 12 paymentsAll XAGG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 12 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Nov 28, 2025 $0.25; Dec 23, 2025 $0.26; Jan 30, 2026 $0.28; Feb 27, 2026 $0.27; Mar 31, 2026 $0.28; Apr 30, 2026 $0.29; May 29, 2026 $0.29; Jun 30, 2026 $0.29; Jul 31, 2026 $0.29; Aug 31, 2026 $0.28; Sep 30, 2026 $0.27; Oct 30, 2026 $0.27. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

GINC vs XAGG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GINC 0.71XAGG 0.18

GINC and XAGG in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • GINCAvsVGMSA

    Goldman Sachs ETF Trust · Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XAGGAvsVGMSA

    Eaton Vance Strategic Income Opportunities ETF · Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GINCAvsAINPA

    Goldman Sachs ETF Trust · Allspring Income Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XAGGAvsAINPA

    Eaton Vance Strategic Income Opportunities ETF · Allspring Income Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GINCAvsTMBB

    Goldman Sachs ETF Trust · Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.55%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XAGGAvsTMBB

    Eaton Vance Strategic Income Opportunities ETF · Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.55%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.