TCAL ranks 1st and GINX 21st of 50 funds in the Active Option Income Category.
GINX vs TCAL
TCAL −0.68pt a year
1.02%0.34%
TCAL 10.0×the volume
7.96K79.2K
GINX vs TCAL Performance
+23.9%+10.8%
- GINX 1.02%
- TCAL 0.34%, better
- GINX $105M
- TCAL $321M
- GINX +23.9%, better
- TCAL +10.8%
- GINX 2.22%
- TCAL 11.55%, better
- GINX 131
- TCAL 106
- GINX 7.96K sh
- TCAL 79.2K sh, better
- GINX $35.23
- TCAL $23.03
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GINX | TCAL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | A97Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A71Higher | B67 |
| Tradability | B66Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | A83 | A87Higher |
| Durability | B66 | A84Higher |
Rank among Active Option Income funds
Same Category. GINX and TCAL are both graded against the same 50 Active Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GINXC
TCALA
In short
GINX Most income funds rent out the stocks they own. GINX keeps its global dividend sleeve intact and runs the income engine beside it: daily credit call spreads on US indices, where the purchased call sets a ceiling on the option leg's loss.
TCAL An active stock picker's take on the covered-call trade: roughly 70 hand-chosen holdings, calls written on top, cash paid out monthly, all for 0.34% a year.
Stated mandate
GINX The Fund seeks current income as its primary objective and capital appreciation as its secondary objective. It is actively managed and combines global-equity ETFs with daily index credit call spreads to generate income.
TCAL The fund seeks regular distributions while aiming to preserve capital and potentially achieve capital appreciation. It invests in equities and writes covered calls to generate cash flow alongside dividends.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GINX vs TCAL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GINX vs TCAL Cost
Overpaying GINX vs TCAL
$12,080
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GINX 1.02%
$19,012
TCAL 0.34%
$6,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GINX | TCAL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $616 | $1,181 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $2,386 | $4,360 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $6,932 | $12,080 |
- 1.02%GINX
- 0.34%TCAL, cheaper
- Middle half of Active Option Income funds
- Median 0.95%
TCAL 2nd cheapest of 50 funds
GINX 36th cheapest of 50 funds
GINX vs TCAL Dividends
- GINX 2.22%
- TCAL 11.55%, better
- GINX $0.80
- TCAL $2.71
- GINX $0.15
- TCAL $0.26
- GINX Sep 28, 2026
- TCAL Oct 30, 2026
- GINX Sep 29, 2026
- TCAL Nov 3, 2026
- GINX Quarterly
- TCAL Monthly
Distribution history
GINX vs TCAL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GINX 9.6%TCAL 9.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- GINX 1.27TCAL 0.24
- Worst fall
- GINX −12.5%TCAL −7.2%
- Market sensitivity
- GINX 0.53TCAL 0.20
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.