Skip to content

GLBL vs SCHK

Pacer MSCI World Industry Advan

GLBLDCboe

Schwab 1000 Index ETF

SCHKANYSE Arca

Overlap

58.4%by weight

Expense ratio

SCHK −0.62pt a year

GLBL0.65%SCHK0.03%

Avg volume · 30D

SCHK 7297.1×the volume

GLBL180SCHK1.31M

GLBL vs SCHK Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.9%GLBL+11.8%SCHK

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GLBL +8.9%. SCHK +11.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GLBL 0.65%
SCHK 0.03%, better
Fund size
GLBL $1M
SCHK $5.69B
1Y total return
GLBL +8.9%
SCHK +11.8%, better
Yield (12M)
GLBL 0.76%
SCHK 1.05%, better
Holdings
GLBL 358
SCHK 999
Avg volume (30D)
GLBL 180 sh
SCHK 1.31M sh, better
NAV per share
GLBL $27.38
SCHK $36.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GLBL: Cost 13, Risk 46, Mission 74, Tradability 15, Holdings 45, Durability 13. SCHK: Cost 98, Risk 66, Mission 100, Tradability 90, Holdings 57, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for GLBL, SCHK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGLBLSCHK
Cost30% weightF13A98Higher
Mission25% weightA74A100Higher
Risk15% weightC46B66Higher
Tradability15% weightF15A90Higher
Holdings10% weightC45B57Higher
Durability5% weightF13B68Higher

Rank among Other Major Indexes funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GLBL and SCHK are both graded against the same 42 Other Major Indexes funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Other Major Indexes⁠

Category · 42 funds
See all 42 ›

SCHK ranks 2nd and GLBL 33rd of 42 funds in the Other Major Indexes Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYVState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETFScore 89
  2. Rank 2ASCHKSchwab 1000 Index ETFScore 86
  3. Rank 3APBUSInvesco MSCI USA ETFScore 85
  4. Rank 31DGVIPGoldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETFScore 37
  5. Rank 33DGLBLPacer MSCI World Industry AdvanScore 36
  6. Rank 33DWDAIPacer S&P World 3AI Top 300 ETFScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GLBLDPacer MSCI World Industry Advan

SCHKASchwab 1000 Index ETF

In short

GLBL Most global funds hand you the world sorted by size. GLBL starts from the MSCI World Index and screens for the leading companies in each country, landing on roughly 400 developed-market names. A newer, pricier route to going global.

SCHK Schwab's house-built alternative to the S&P 500: the 1,000 largest US companies in one passive wrapper, reaching past the mega-caps into mid-cap turf, priced at three basis points.

Stated mandate

GLBL The fund seeks global market growth through a strategy that screens the MSCI World Index for leading companies from each country.

SCHK The fund seeks to track the total return of the Schwab 1000 Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • GLBL The roster is chosen, not inherited: it screens the MSCI World Index for each country's leading companies instead of simply buying the whole cap-weighted list.paceretfs.com
  • About 400 holdings spread across developed markets worldwide, so the outcome rides on the screen rather than on one company or one country.paceretfs.com
  • Plain index wrapper mechanics with cash returned on a quarterly cadence.
  • SCHK 0.03% a year, the lowest fee among the top-scoring funds in its index-wrapper group and a small fraction of what the typical fund there charges.
  • About 1,000 stocks covering roughly 90% or more of US stock market value: the S&P 500 names plus a layer of mid caps most large-blend funds skip.schwabassetmanagement.com
  • Tracks its stated index tightly and stands among the strongest implementations in its peer group of plain index wrappers.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively and pays distributions quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • GLBL At 0.65%, the fee runs above the 0.45% median for index-tracking funds in its group, and cap-weighted world funds like VT charge 0.06%.
  • Launched in September 2024. Short history, and it remains a small, lightly traded fund, which tends to mean wider bid-ask spreads.
  • This is a screened slice of MSCI World, not the index itself, so results can drift from the familiar global benchmark in either direction.
  • SCHK Weighted by market value, so the biggest US companies drive the bulk of results. Those extra 500 names carry less weight than the headcount suggests.schwabassetmanagement.com
  • All-US, all-equity by mandate: no bonds, no foreign stocks, and it rides the full swings of the US market.
  • The benchmark is Schwab's own proprietary index, so there is no rival fund on the identical yardstick for a side-by-side comparison.

Full GLBL profile⁠

Full SCHK profile⁠

GLBL vs SCHK Holdings

As of

How GLBL and SCHK differ

Overlap by weight

58.4%

Shared holdings make up 86.0% of GLBL and 62.2% of SCHK.

Level by level

  • Holdings235 in both58.4%
  • Sector11 Sectors85.2%
  • Countryby domicile86.3%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in GLBL and SCHK, widest gap first
SectorMore in GLBLMore in SCHK
TechnologyGLBL +6.0 points
IndustrialsSCHK +5.8 points
CommunicationGLBL +5.5 points
Health CareSCHK +3.7 points
EnergySCHK +2.3 points
Consumer DiscretionaryGLBL +1.7 points
UtilitiesSCHK +1.5 points
FinancialsGLBL +0.8 points
Consumer StaplesSCHK +0.8 points
MaterialsSCHK +0.8 points
Real EstateGLBL +0.7 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GLBL and SCHK, widest gap first
CountryMore in GLBLMore in SCHK
United StatesSCHK +13.6 points
JapanGLBL +4.9 points
CanadaGLBL +4.8 points
SwitzerlandGLBL +2.2 points
GermanyGLBL +0.7 points
Other countries (9)GLBL +1.0 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GLBL40.5%
  • SCHK34.4%

Securities held

  • GLBL353
  • SCHK999

Asset class

GLBL
Equity
SCHK
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GLBL118
  • In both235
  • Only in SCHK764

Only in GLBL

118 securities, 13.8% of GLBL by weight

  • Roche Holding AG0.79%
  • Royal Bank of Canada0.65%
  • Novartis AG0.65%

Only in SCHK

764 securities, 37.8% of SCHK by weight

  • Tesla Inc1.58%
  • Eli Lilly1.52%
  • JPMorgan Chase1.27%

Weight gaps

The 100 widest of 235 Holdings in both funds.

Holding weights in GLBL and SCHK, widest gap first
HoldingMore in GLBLMore in SCHK
Alphabet IncGOOGLGLBL +2.24 points
NVIDIA CorpNVDASCHK +2.10 points
Alphabet IncGOOGGLBL +1.71 points
Apple IncAAPLSCHK +1.69 points
Meta Platforms IncMETAGLBL +1.63 points
Amazon.com IncAMZNGLBL +1.55 points
Broadcom IncAVGOGLBL +1.27 points
Micron Technology IncMUGLBL +0.94 points

All 359 GLBL holdings⁠All 1,001 SCHK holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GLBL vs SCHK Cost

Overpaying GLBL vs SCHK

$12,079

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GLBL 0.65%

    $12,717

  • SCHK 0.03%

    $638

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GLBL 0.65%
  • SCHK 0.03%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530GLBL $12,717SCHK $638

Year by year

YearGLBLSCHKOverpaying
10$1,163$55$1,108
20$4,440$216$4,224
30$12,717$638$12,079

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%GLBL
  • 0.03%SCHK, cheaper
  • Middle half of Other Major Indexes funds
  • Median 0.29%

SCHK cheapest of 42 funds

GLBL 36th cheapest of 42 funds

GLBL vs SCHK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GLBL 0.76%
SCHK 1.05%, better
Payout (12M)
GLBL $0.21
SCHK $0.38
Last payment
GLBL $0.009
SCHK $0.10
Ex-dividend
GLBL Sep 3, 2026
SCHK Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
GLBL Sep 8, 2026
SCHK Sep 28, 2026
Frequency
GLBL Quarterly
SCHK Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GLBLQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll GLBL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2024 $0.03; Jun 5, 2025 $0.01; Sep 4, 2025 $0.02; Dec 30, 2025 $0.19; Jun 4, 2026 $0.009; Sep 3, 2026 $0.009. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD
SCHKQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll SCHK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $0.04; Dec 27, 2017 $0.0025; Mar 16, 2018 $0.04; Jun 26, 2018 $0.06; Sep 25, 2018 $0.06; Dec 12, 2018 $0.06; Mar 20, 2019 $0.06; Jun 26, 2019 $0.06; Sep 25, 2019 $0.07; Dec 12, 2019 $0.09; Mar 25, 2020 $0.07; Jun 24, 2020 $0.06; Sep 23, 2020 $0.09; Dec 10, 2020 $0.07; Mar 24, 2021 $0.06; Jun 23, 2021 $0.06; Sep 22, 2021 $0.07; Dec 8, 2021 $0.08; Dec 30, 2021 $0.004; Mar 23, 2022 $0.06; Jun 22, 2022 $0.07; Sep 21, 2022 $0.07; Dec 7, 2022 $0.09; Mar 22, 2023 $0.07; Jun 21, 2023 $0.08; Sep 20, 2023 $0.08; Dec 6, 2023 $0.09; Dec 28, 2023 $0.0035; Mar 20, 2024 $0.08; Jun 26, 2024 $0.08; Sep 25, 2024 $0.08; Dec 11, 2024 $0.10; Mar 26, 2025 $0.08; Jun 25, 2025 $0.09; Sep 24, 2025 $0.09; Dec 10, 2025 $0.10; Mar 25, 2026 $0.09; Jun 24, 2026 $0.09; Sep 23, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD

GLBL vs SCHK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GLBL 16.1%since Oct 2024SCHK 12.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GLBL 0.72since Oct 2024SCHK 1.39
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GLBL −19.6%since Sep 2024SCHK −25.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GLBL 1.18SCHK 1.02

Popular comparisons

  • GLBLDvsSPYVA

    Pacer MSCI World Industry Advan · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHKAvsSPYVA

    Schwab 1000 Index ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GLBLDvsPBUSA

    Pacer MSCI World Industry Advan · Invesco MSCI USA ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHKAvsPBUSA

    Schwab 1000 Index ETF · Invesco MSCI USA ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GLBLDvsVOOVA

    Pacer MSCI World Industry Advan · Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHKAvsVOOVA

    Schwab 1000 Index ETF · Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.