SLJY ranks 3rd and GLDN 12th of 12 funds in the Gold & Metals Option Income Category.
GLDN vs SLJY
SLJY −0.31pt a year
1.07%0.76%
SLJY 5.1×the volume
7.2K36.6K
GLDN vs SLJY Performance
+0.8%−6.4%
- GLDN 1.07%
- SLJY 0.76%, better
- GLDN $4M
- SLJY $63M
- GLDN
- SLJY +4.7%
- GLDN
- SLJY 31.04%
- GLDN 28
- SLJY 54
- GLDN 7.2K sh
- SLJY 36.6K sh, better
- GLDN $14.33
- SLJY $22.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GLDN | SLJY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F12 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | D34 | C45Higher |
| Tradability | D28 | C41Higher |
| Holdings | A71 | A79Higher |
| Durability | D29 | C51Higher |
Rank among Gold & Metals Option Income funds
Same Category. GLDN and SLJY are both graded against the same 12 Gold & Metals Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GLDND
SLJYB
In short
GLDN Most gold-income funds pick a lane: the miners or the metal. GLDN swings at both plus an options overlay in one actively managed wrapper, and it keeps capital appreciation as the primary goal with income riding shotgun.
SLJY Junior silver miners swing hard. SLJY sells that volatility: an out-of-the-money covered-call overlay on a junior silver miner basket, targeting 18% annualized option premium and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
GLDN The Fund is actively managed and seeks capital appreciation as its primary objective, with current income as a secondary objective. It combines gold-industry equities, commodity exposure, and an options overlay.
SLJY The fund seeks to balance high income and capital appreciation through exposure to junior silver mining companies and a covered-call strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GLDN vs SLJY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GLDN vs SLJY Cost
Overpaying GLDN vs SLJY
$5,159
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GLDN 1.07%
$19,815
SLJY 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GLDN | SLJY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,881 | $1,353 | $528 |
| 20 | $7,046 | $5,142 | $1,904 |
| 30 | $19,815 | $14,656 | $5,159 |
- 1.07%GLDN
- 0.76%SLJY, cheaper
- Middle half of Gold & Metals Option Income funds
- Median 0.95%
SLJY 2nd cheapest of 12 funds
GLDN 11th cheapest of 12 funds
GLDN vs SLJY Dividends
- GLDN
- SLJY 31.04%
- GLDN
- SLJY $7.16
- GLDN $0.04
- SLJY $0.46
- GLDN Oct 26, 2026
- SLJY Oct 29, 2026
- GLDN Oct 27, 2026
- SLJY Oct 30, 2026
- GLDN Weekly
- SLJY Monthly
Distribution history
GLDN vs SLJY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GLDN SLJY 48.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- GLDN SLJY 0.32
- Worst fall
- GLDN SLJY −37.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GLDN 0.96SLJY 0.71
Popular comparisons
- 1.07% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.